Skip to content

Commit eaa1ebb

Browse files
committed
investigation summary
1 parent d76d695 commit eaa1ebb

File tree

1 file changed

+59
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+59
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 59 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1+
# How Claude Code Helped Investigate Critical Mobile App Referral Drops
2+
3+
## Executive Summary
4+
5+
Claude Code identified potential causes for two major drops in Jetpack mobile app installations by analyzing an unfamiliar codebase (WordPress Calypso):
6+
7+
- **April 3-5, 2025**: 40-50% drop in web referrals (both platforms) - potentially related to What's New modal removal
8+
- **March 10-14, 2025**: iOS-specific install drop - possibly connected to mobile detection changes in magic login
9+
10+
## The Investigation Results
11+
12+
### Problem 1: April App Banner Disappearance
13+
**Potential Cause**: Commit `c0a10a96671` removed the What's New modal system (1,385 lines), which may have inadvertently affected app banner display.
14+
**Proposed Fix**: Two-line addition to restore the potentially missing AppBanner component.
15+
16+
### Problem 2: March iOS Install Drop
17+
**Possible Cause**: Commit `8faa70b0f91` modified mobile detection logic, which could be misidentifying iOS devices as desktop browsers.
18+
**Impact**: Only iOS affected, Android continued normally.
19+
20+
## What Made These Prompts Effective
21+
22+
### Strengths
23+
- **Specific data**: Exact dates, percentages, and platform distinctions
24+
- **Natural language**: Information scattered as one would speak, not formally organized
25+
- **Clear outputs**: Requested markdown reports with GitHub links
26+
- **Trust in AI**: Let Claude work autonomously with minimal correction
27+
28+
### Minor Areas for Improvement
29+
- **Year clarification**: Had to specify 2025, not 2024
30+
- **Date precision**: "After March 10 in about 4 days" → "March 10-14"
31+
32+
## Why This Worked
33+
34+
The user's observation: "I didn't feel like I had to explain or correct what you were working on after my initial prompts except for a few instances."
35+
36+
This efficiency stemmed from:
37+
- Clear problem statements with business context
38+
- Letting Claude Code work through its systematic approach
39+
- Natural, conversational prompts that didn't require formal structure
40+
41+
## Key Takeaways
42+
43+
### For Teams Using AI Investigation
44+
1. **Be specific**: Dates, percentages, and platforms matter
45+
2. **Write naturally**: No need to organize information perfectly
46+
3. **Request outputs**: Ask for formatted reports to share
47+
4. **Trust the process**: Minimal correction usually needed
48+
49+
### The Meta-Point
50+
This document itself was generated through AI assistance with a few iterations for refinement:
51+
- Initial generation with the requested structure
52+
- Updates to use tentative language and avoid blame
53+
- Final accuracy improvements
54+
55+
This demonstrates that even document creation benefits from the same iterative approach as the investigation - quick initial results followed by targeted refinements.
56+
57+
## Conclusion
58+
59+
Claude Code transformed a complex investigation in an unfamiliar codebase into a rapid discovery process. Two potential causes for mobile app installation drops were identified in minutes rather than days, providing clear paths for further investigation. The natural language interaction and minimal need for correction show that AI-assisted development isn't just about speed - it's about making expert-level investigation accessible to any developer.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)