-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Always prepare reports #302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Benchmarks [x86_64 wall]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 14 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 memleak]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 23 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 cpu]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 23 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 alloc]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 23 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 wall]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 14 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 cpu,wall,alloc,memleak]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 13 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 cpu,wall]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 23 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 cpu,wall]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 13 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 memleak,alloc]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 21 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 cpu,wall,alloc,memleak]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 13 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 alloc]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 15 metrics, 21 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 cpu]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 22 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [x86_64 memleak,alloc]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 13 metrics, 23 unstable metrics.
|
Benchmarks [aarch64 memleak]Parameters
See matching parameters
SummaryFound 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 13 metrics, 20 unstable metrics.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR attempts to optimize the workflow by adding a failure() condition to the "Prepare reports" steps so that reports are only prepared when they will be uploaded. However, the changes introduce a critical bug that breaks the unwinding reports functionality.
Key Issue
- The
prepare_reports.shscript prepares both test reports (uploaded on failure) and unwinding reports (uploaded on success) - Adding
failure()to the "Prepare reports" steps prevents unwinding reports from being prepared when tests succeed - This breaks the "Upload unwinding reports" step which runs on
success() && matrix.config == 'debug'
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
7450f0e to
347c41b
Compare
347c41b to
9727b51
Compare
A trivial fix to always prepare reports.
The test reports are uploaded only on failure but they were generated only on success (default condition).
Note: The perf regression was introduced in TLS priming and #303 is working on dealing with it
Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!