From 1158b8e8c6db020099559d13666eb74b524b9f8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 22:32:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] Initial plan
From a49249b3c83e5447e3516f24f07764a44f001e4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 22:55:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 02/20] Implement Phase 4 Code Generation Optimizations:
reflection caching, template generation, and staged transformations
Co-authored-by: Puchaczov <6973258+Puchaczov@users.noreply.github.com>
---
.copilot_session_summary.md | 101 ----
.../Optimization/OptimizationManagerTests.cs | 247 ++++++++++
.../Optimization/CodeGenerationTemplates.cs | 352 ++++++++++++++
.../Optimization/OptimizationManager.cs | 412 ++++++++++++++++
.../StagedTransformationManager.cs | 454 ++++++++++++++++++
.../Optimization/TypeCacheManager.cs | 274 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 1739 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 .copilot_session_summary.md
create mode 100644 Musoq.Evaluator.Tests/Optimization/OptimizationManagerTests.cs
create mode 100644 Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/CodeGenerationTemplates.cs
create mode 100644 Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/OptimizationManager.cs
create mode 100644 Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/StagedTransformationManager.cs
create mode 100644 Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/TypeCacheManager.cs
diff --git a/.copilot_session_summary.md b/.copilot_session_summary.md
deleted file mode 100644
index c62e0f75..00000000
--- a/.copilot_session_summary.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
-# Copilot Session Summary
-
-## Last Updated
-2025-01-27 23:45 UTC - Session 4: Phase 3 Memory Management + Overall Performance Demonstration COMPLETED
-
-## Completed Tasks - Phase 3: Memory Management + Performance Achievement
-
-### ✅ Phase 3: Memory Management Infrastructure
-- **MemoryPool**: Thread-safe LRU-based pooling for Table and ObjectResolver instances
-- **PooledTable**: Reusable table implementation with IReadOnlyTable compliance
-- **PooledObjectResolver**: Pooled resolver implementing IObjectResolver + IReadOnlyRow interfaces
-- **MemoryPoolManager**: Centralized control with enable/disable and pre-warming capabilities
-- **Performance Documentation**: Complete Phase 3 progress tracking in PHASE_3_PERFORMANCE_PROGRESS.md
-
-### 🚀 Overall Performance Achievement: 25-40% Improvement
-- **Phase 1**: Assembly caching delivering 40-60% compilation overhead reduction
-- **Phase 2**: Schema provider optimization infrastructure for 15-30% method resolution improvement
-- **Phase 3**: Memory management infrastructure for 40% allocation reduction
-- **Combined Impact**: 25-40% overall performance improvement for typical workloads
-
-### Files Created - Phase 3
-- **NEW** `Musoq.Schema/Performance/MemoryPool.cs` - Core memory pooling with ConcurrentQueue and statistics
-- **NEW** `Musoq.Schema/Performance/MemoryPoolManager.cs` - Global manager with enable/disable controls
-- **NEW** `Musoq.Schema/Performance/PooledTable.cs` - Reusable table implementation with proper disposal
-- **NEW** `Musoq.Schema/Performance/PooledObjectResolver.cs` - Pooled resolver with dual interface compliance
-- **NEW** `Musoq.Benchmarks/Demo/PerformanceDemo.cs` - Performance demonstration infrastructure
-- **NEW** `PHASE_3_PERFORMANCE_PROGRESS.md` - Complete performance improvement documentation
-
-### Technical Implementation Details
-
-#### Memory Pool Architecture
-- **Thread-safe pooling**: ConcurrentQueue with proper synchronization for high-concurrency scenarios
-- **Automatic lifecycle management**: Objects returned to pool on disposal, with reset functionality
-- **Pool statistics**: Real-time tracking of hit rates, efficiency, and available objects
-- **Pre-warming support**: Initialize pools with capacity for optimal performance
-- **Configurable limits**: Customizable pool sizes and retention policies
-
-#### Performance Monitoring Integration
-- **Comprehensive statistics**: All optimization phases provide detailed efficiency metrics
-- **Real-time monitoring**: Track cache hits, method compilation success, memory pool utilization
-- **Regression testing**: Framework ready for automated performance validation
-- **Enable/disable controls**: Independent control over each optimization phase for testing
-
-### Performance Impact Validation
-
-#### Real-World Scenarios Tested
-1. **Repeated Query Execution**: 70% faster (120ms → 35ms)
-2. **High-Volume Processing**: 40% memory allocation reduction
-3. **Complex Schema Operations**: 15-30% method resolution improvement
-4. **Overall Tool Performance**: 25-40% improvement for typical workloads
-
-#### Infrastructure Readiness
-- **Build Status**: ✅ All projects compile successfully with zero errors
-- **Integration**: ✅ Seamless fallback to existing functionality maintained
-- **Compatibility**: ✅ Zero breaking changes to public API
-- **Production Ready**: ✅ All optimizations independently controllable
-
-## Current Status - PHASE 1-3 OPTIMIZATION COMPLETE ✅
-
-- **Build Status**: ✅ SUCCESS - All projects compile with Phase 1-3 optimizations
-- **Performance Target**: ✅ ACHIEVED - 25-40% overall improvement infrastructure operational
-- **Documentation**: ✅ COMPLETE - Comprehensive performance tracking and progress documentation
-- **Integration**: ✅ READY - Production-ready optimization infrastructure with monitoring
-
-### Optimization Infrastructure Summary
-- **Assembly Caching**: QueryAssemblyCacheManager with 40-60% compilation overhead reduction
-- **Method Compilation**: SchemaMethodCompilationCacheManager with 15-30% method resolution improvement
-- **Memory Management**: MemoryPoolManager with 40% allocation reduction capability
-- **Performance Monitoring**: Comprehensive statistics and efficiency tracking across all phases
-
-## Next Session Priorities
-
-**Performance Optimization COMPLETE**:
-1. **✅ Phase 1**: Assembly caching infrastructure operational
-2. **✅ Phase 2**: Schema provider optimization infrastructure ready
-3. **✅ Phase 3**: Memory management infrastructure implemented
-4. **🎯 ACHIEVED**: 25-40% overall performance improvement target
-
-**Future Development Options**:
-1. **Production Integration**: Deploy optimizations into method resolution pipeline
-2. **Advanced Optimizations**: Query plan optimization, vectorization, adaptive parallelization
-3. **Performance Validation**: Comprehensive benchmarking and real-world testing
-4. **Monitoring Integration**: CI/CD performance gates and regression prevention
-
-## Key Achievements
-
-- **🚀 25-40% Performance Improvement**: Complete optimization infrastructure delivering target performance gains
-- **🧠 Memory Management**: 40% allocation reduction through intelligent object pooling
-- **⚡ Method Optimization**: Expression tree compilation replacing expensive reflection
-- **📊 Assembly Caching**: 40-60% compilation overhead reduction for repeated queries
-- **🔧 Production Ready**: Zero breaking changes with comprehensive monitoring and control
-- **📈 Comprehensive Monitoring**: Real-time performance tracking and regression testing framework
-
-## Context for Next Developer/Session - OPTIMIZATION TARGET ACHIEVED
-
-- **Performance Status**: Phase 1-3 complete with 25-40% improvement infrastructure operational
-- **All optimization components implemented**: Assembly caching, method compilation, memory pooling
-- **Zero breaking changes**: Complete backward compatibility maintained
-- **Production ready**: Comprehensive monitoring and independent optimization controls
-- **Performance framework**: Complete infrastructure for validation, regression testing, and continuous optimization
-- **🎉 SUCCESS**: Musoq is now significantly faster for typical workloads with measurable performance improvements
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Musoq.Evaluator.Tests/Optimization/OptimizationManagerTests.cs b/Musoq.Evaluator.Tests/Optimization/OptimizationManagerTests.cs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e01f896c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Musoq.Evaluator.Tests/Optimization/OptimizationManagerTests.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+using System;
+using System.Linq;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
+using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
+using Musoq.Evaluator.Optimization;
+
+namespace Musoq.Evaluator.Tests.Optimization;
+
+[TestClass]
+public class OptimizationManagerTests
+{
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void TypeCacheManager_CachesTypesCorrectly()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ TypeCacheManager.ClearCaches();
+
+ // Act
+ var stringType1 = TypeCacheManager.GetCachedType("System.String");
+ var stringType2 = TypeCacheManager.GetCachedType("System.String");
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.AreEqual(stringType1, stringType2);
+
+ var stats = TypeCacheManager.GetStatistics();
+ Assert.AreEqual(1, stats.TypeCacheMisses); // First call was a miss
+ Assert.AreEqual(1, stats.TypeCacheHits); // Second call was a hit
+ Assert.AreEqual(0.5, stats.TypeCacheHitRatio); // 50% hit ratio
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void TypeCacheManager_CachesCastableTypeNames()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ TypeCacheManager.ClearCaches();
+
+ // Act
+ var castableName1 = TypeCacheManager.GetCachedCastableTypeName(typeof(string));
+ var castableName2 = TypeCacheManager.GetCachedCastableTypeName(typeof(int));
+ var castableName3 = TypeCacheManager.GetCachedCastableTypeName(typeof(string)); // Should be cached
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.AreEqual("string", castableName1);
+ Assert.AreEqual("int", castableName2);
+ Assert.AreEqual("string", castableName3);
+
+ var stats = TypeCacheManager.GetStatistics();
+ Assert.AreEqual(2, stats.CastableTypeCacheSize); // Two distinct types cached
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void OptimizationManager_AnalyzesSimpleQuery()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var optimizationManager = new OptimizationManager();
+ var input = new QueryAnalysisInput
+ {
+ QueryId = "test_query_1",
+ Pattern = new QueryPattern
+ {
+ HasJoins = false,
+ HasAggregations = false,
+ HasComplexFiltering = false,
+ ComplexityScore = 2,
+ RequiredFields = new[] { "Name", "Age" },
+ RequiredTypes = new[] { typeof(string), typeof(int) }
+ },
+ Context = new QueryAnalysisContext
+ {
+ HasFiltering = false,
+ HasProjections = true,
+ HasJoins = false,
+ HasAggregations = false,
+ ComplexityScore = 2
+ }
+ };
+
+ // Act
+ var plan = optimizationManager.AnalyzeQuery(input);
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsNotNull(plan);
+ Assert.AreEqual("test_query_1", plan.QueryId);
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.ReflectionCaching));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.TemplateGeneration));
+ Assert.AreEqual(OptimizationLevel.Intermediate, plan.OptimizationLevel);
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EstimatedImprovement > 0);
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void OptimizationManager_SelectsCorrectOptimizationsForComplexQuery()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var optimizationManager = new OptimizationManager();
+ var input = new QueryAnalysisInput
+ {
+ QueryId = "complex_query_1",
+ Pattern = new QueryPattern
+ {
+ HasJoins = true,
+ HasAggregations = true,
+ HasComplexFiltering = true,
+ ComplexityScore = 8,
+ RequiredFields = new[] { "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J" }, // 10 fields
+ RequiredTypes = new[] { typeof(string), typeof(int) }
+ },
+ Context = new QueryAnalysisContext
+ {
+ HasFiltering = true,
+ HasProjections = true,
+ HasJoins = true,
+ HasAggregations = true,
+ ComplexityScore = 8
+ }
+ };
+
+ // Act
+ var plan = optimizationManager.AnalyzeQuery(input);
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsNotNull(plan);
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.ReflectionCaching));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.StagedTransformation));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.ExpressionTreeCompilation));
+ Assert.AreEqual(OptimizationLevel.Advanced, plan.OptimizationLevel);
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EstimatedImprovement >= 0.6); // Should be high improvement for complex query
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void CodeGenerationTemplates_GeneratesSimpleSelectTemplate()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var className = "TestQuery";
+ var sourceExpression = "dataSource";
+ var fieldExpressions = new[] { "row[\"Name\"]", "row[\"Age\"]" };
+
+ // Act
+ var code = CodeGenerationTemplates.SimpleSelectTemplate(className, sourceExpression, fieldExpressions);
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsTrue(code.Contains("public class TestQuery : IRunnable"));
+ Assert.IsTrue(code.Contains("Table Run(CancellationToken token)"));
+ Assert.IsTrue(code.Contains("row[\"Name\"]"));
+ Assert.IsTrue(code.Contains("row[\"Age\"]"));
+ Assert.IsTrue(code.Contains("new Table(\"QueryResult\", results)"));
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void StagedTransformationManager_CreatesCorrectPlanForComplexQuery()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var manager = new StagedTransformationManager();
+ var context = new QueryAnalysisContext
+ {
+ HasFiltering = true,
+ HasProjections = true,
+ HasJoins = true,
+ HasAggregations = true,
+ ComplexityScore = 6
+ };
+
+ // Act
+ var plan = manager.AnalyzeAndCreatePlan(context);
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsNotNull(plan);
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.RequiresStaging);
+ Assert.AreEqual(4, plan.Stages.Count); // Filter, Projection, Join, Aggregation
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.EstimatedPerformanceGain > 0);
+
+ // Check stage types
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.Stages.Any(s => s.Type == StageType.Filter));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.Stages.Any(s => s.Type == StageType.Projection));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.Stages.Any(s => s.Type == StageType.Join));
+ Assert.IsTrue(plan.Stages.Any(s => s.Type == StageType.Aggregation));
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void FieldAccessTemplate_GeneratesOptimizedAccess()
+ {
+ // Act
+ var stringAccess = CodeGenerationTemplates.FieldAccessTemplate("Name", typeof(string));
+ var intAccess = CodeGenerationTemplates.FieldAccessTemplate("Age", typeof(int));
+ var customAccess = CodeGenerationTemplates.FieldAccessTemplate("CustomField", typeof(DateTime));
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.AreEqual("row[\"Name\"] as string", stringAccess);
+ Assert.AreEqual("Convert.ToInt32(row[\"Age\"])", intAccess);
+ Assert.AreEqual("Convert.ToDateTime(row[\"CustomField\"])", customAccess);
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void OptimizationManager_GetStatistics()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var optimizationManager = new OptimizationManager();
+ TypeCacheManager.ClearCaches();
+
+ // Perform some operations to generate statistics
+ TypeCacheManager.GetCachedType("System.String");
+ TypeCacheManager.GetCachedType("System.Int32");
+ TypeCacheManager.GetCachedType("System.String"); // Cache hit
+
+ // Act
+ var stats = optimizationManager.GetStatistics();
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsNotNull(stats);
+ Assert.IsNotNull(stats.CacheStatistics);
+ Assert.AreEqual(2, stats.CacheStatistics.TypeCacheSize);
+ Assert.AreEqual(1, stats.CacheStatistics.TypeCacheHits);
+ Assert.AreEqual(2, stats.CacheStatistics.TypeCacheMisses);
+ }
+
+ [TestMethod]
+ public void OptimizationManager_CanConfigureOptimizations()
+ {
+ // Arrange
+ var optimizationManager = new OptimizationManager();
+
+ // Act
+ optimizationManager.ConfigureOptimization(OptimizationType.StagedTransformation, false);
+
+ // Test with a complex query that would normally use staged transformation
+ var input = new QueryAnalysisInput
+ {
+ QueryId = "test_disabled_staging",
+ Pattern = new QueryPattern
+ {
+ HasJoins = true,
+ HasAggregations = true,
+ ComplexityScore = 10
+ },
+ Context = new QueryAnalysisContext
+ {
+ HasJoins = true,
+ HasAggregations = true,
+ ComplexityScore = 10
+ }
+ };
+
+ var plan = optimizationManager.AnalyzeQuery(input);
+
+ // Assert
+ Assert.IsFalse(plan.EnabledOptimizations.Contains(OptimizationType.StagedTransformation));
+ }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/CodeGenerationTemplates.cs b/Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/CodeGenerationTemplates.cs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bdd82f97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Musoq.Evaluator/Optimization/CodeGenerationTemplates.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
+using System;
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+using System.Linq;
+using System.Text;
+using System.Threading;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
+using Musoq.Evaluator.Tables;
+using Musoq.Parser.Nodes;
+using Musoq.Parser.Nodes.From;
+using Musoq.Schema;
+
+namespace Musoq.Evaluator.Optimization;
+
+///
+/// Template-based code generation for common query patterns.
+/// Targets 20-30% reduction in generated code size and complexity.
+///
+public static class CodeGenerationTemplates
+{
+ ///
+ /// Template for simple SELECT projection without joins or aggregations.
+ ///
+ public static string SimpleSelectTemplate(
+ string className,
+ string sourceExpression,
+ IEnumerable fieldExpressions,
+ string filterExpression = null)
+ {
+ var fieldsCode = string.Join(",\n ", fieldExpressions.Select(f => $"({f})"));
+ var filterCode = string.IsNullOrEmpty(filterExpression) ? "" : $"if ({filterExpression}) ";
+
+ return $@"
+public class {className} : IRunnable
+{{
+ public ISchemaProvider Provider {{ get; set; }}
+ public IReadOnlyDictionary> PositionalEnvironmentVariables {{ get; set; }}
+ public IReadOnlyDictionary UsedColumns, WhereNode WhereNode, bool HasExternallyProvidedTypes)> QueriesInformation {{ get; set; }}
+ public ILogger Logger {{ get; set; }}
+
+ public Table Run(CancellationToken token)
+ {{
+ var results = new List