forked from fake-afik/my-best-repo
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
⚡️ Speed up function sorter
by 30,125%
#335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
codeflash-ai
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
codeflash/optimize-sorter-mdiun7o5
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The given code is implementing the bubble sort algorithm, which is not optimal for sorting. We can significantly increase the speed of this function by switching to a more efficient sorting algorithm like Timsort, which is the default sorting algorithm used in Python. Here's the optimized version. This utilizes Python's built-in `sort` method, which is highly efficient with a time complexity of O(n log n).
codeflash-ai bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2025
…timize-sorter-mdiun7o5`) The function you provided, sorter, is already using Python's built-in sort function which has a time complexity of O(n log n), where n is a number of elements in the array. This is the fastest achievable sorting complexity for comparison-based sorts. However, if you want to achieve a marginal speed increase, writing this in-place might help. Here's an alternative version using list comprehension. Although this does not improve the time complexity, it gives a Pythonic touch: ```python def sorter(arr): return sorted(arr) ``` Again, this command returns a new sorted list and does not modify the original list. If you want to sort the list in-place, you only have the original function: Please note that sorting time complexity cannot be improved further than O(n log n) using comparison-based sorting algorithms. To really optimize this function, you would need a guarantee about the content of your data, for example, if your array only contained integers in a particular range, then you could use counting sort or radix sort, which can have a time complexity of O(n).
⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for
|
codeflash-ai bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2025
…timize-sorter-mdiun7o5`) The function you provided, sorter, is already using Python's built-in sort function which has a time complexity of O(n log n), where n is a number of elements in the array. This is the fastest achievable sorting complexity for comparison-based sorts. However, if you want to achieve a marginal speed increase, writing this in-place might help. Here's an alternative version using list comprehension. Although this does not improve the time complexity, it gives a Pythonic touch: ```python def sorter(arr): return sorted(arr) ``` Again, this command returns a new sorted list and does not modify the original list. If you want to sort the list in-place, you only have the original function: Please note that sorting time complexity cannot be improved further than O(n log n) using comparison-based sorting algorithms. To really optimize this function, you would need a guarantee about the content of your data, for example, if your array only contained integers in a particular range, then you could use counting sort or radix sort, which can have a time complexity of O(n).
⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 30,125% (301.25x) speedup for
sorter
incli/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
⏱️ Runtime :
9.03 seconds
→29.9 milliseconds
(best of32
runs)📝 Explanation and details
The given code is implementing the bubble sort algorithm, which is not optimal for sorting. We can significantly increase the speed of this function by switching to a more efficient sorting algorithm like Timsort, which is the default sorting algorithm used in Python. Here's the optimized version.
This utilizes Python's built-in
sort
method, which is highly efficient with a time complexity of O(n log n).✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-mdiun7o5
and push.