Skip to content

Conversation

@cali-jumptrading
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading force-pushed the cali/lthash branch 7 times, most recently from d91459c to 4b1c022 Compare November 5, 2025 21:30
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2025 21:30
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading changed the title lthash attempt 3 snapshots: lthash v3 Nov 5, 2025
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading force-pushed the cali/lthash branch 3 times, most recently from 3f8dbeb to e6708fc Compare November 5, 2025 21:35
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading force-pushed the cali/lthash branch 16 times, most recently from dd1225b to 30bd8ae Compare November 6, 2025 18:09
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading force-pushed the cali/lthash branch 11 times, most recently from b2b483a to a477530 Compare November 11, 2025 21:14
@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.076389 s 0.07659 s 0.263%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.669 s 4.885 s 83.027% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 76.389209 s 76.590038 s 0.263%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 1002.2 GiB 1.014%

@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.073168 s 0.073292 s 0.169%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.653 s 5.074 s 91.255% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 73.168023 s 73.291987 s 0.169%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 1002.2 GiB 1.014%

@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.064712 s 0.064592 s -0.185%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.177 s 4.059 s 86.449% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 64.712087 s 64.591795 s -0.186%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 993.14 GiB 0.101%

amass-jump
amass-jump previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.064059 s 0.064948 s 1.388%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.156 s 2.333 s 8.210% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 64.058675 s 64.947575 s 1.388%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 993.14 GiB 0.101%

message / etc. */
#define STEM_BURST 2UL
message. Can send one duplicate account message as well. */
#define STEM_BURST 3UL
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading Nov 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

decreasing this from 4 to 3 seems to have fixed some of the perf issues I was seeing with lthash verification.

@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.064382 s 0.064613 s 0.359%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.151 s 2.339 s 8.740% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 64.382445 s 64.613154 s 0.358%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 993.14 GiB 0.101%

100.0-snapdc_idle_pct-snapdc_backp_pct,
100.0-snapin_idle_pct-snapin_backp_pct,
100.0-snapls_idle_pct );
} else {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a if statement to guard whether we print the tile metrics for the snapls tile

@github-actions
Copy link

Performance Measurements ⏳

Suite Baseline New Change
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf per slot 0.064363 s 0.065 s 0.990%
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf snapshot load 2.216 s 2.354 s 6.227% ⚠️
backtest mainnet-368528500-perf total elapsed 64.363421 s 65.000464 s 0.990%
firedancer mem usage with mainnet.toml 992.14 GiB 993.14 GiB 0.101%

@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading merged commit 8e324d4 into main Nov 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@cali-jumptrading cali-jumptrading deleted the cali/lthash branch November 12, 2025 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants