Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Without properly formulated Feature Requests there are no plans to add these vague ideas. The threshold to be included in core rather than being a plugin is considerable as the normal user is already not using tests - judging by FRs and bug reports. so making default usage scenarios more complex will need a logical and well-rounded requirement. but never say never, if it makes sense: why not include it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you all for your time and awesomeness! I can now confirm the test-required-for-completing-build-orders actually works for us in real-life case settings. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I totally adore the implementation of Tests to be performed on Stock Items!
However as far as I noticed, there is no interaction of Test Results with anything else in the database, its merely documentation.
I am wondering if there is a plan to make things like:
hard conditional on positive Test Results?
I fully understand that the complexity of usage can already be demanding and confusing and that expanding the functionality over to procedure control rather than mere documentation is not necessarily the database's job. On the other hand, already having e.g. sales order assignment conditional on the part being salable and dedicated test sections in place made me wonder if my idea is within reach of potential implementation?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions