Update a glossary entry for JSON

[Sullivan-Tony-NASAC]

Please add a sentence that explains JSON is an acronym that stands for JavaScript Object Notation.

[github-actions]

Welcome to the JSON Schema Community. We are so excited you are here! Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue!! 🎉🎉 Please make sure to take a look at our contributors guide if you plan on opening a pull request.
For more details, check out the README.md file.

[animeshsahoo1]

@Sullivan-Tony-NASAC the issue is very vague and it's not really necessary. It would be helpful for the team if you don't add issues like these, You can read the guidelines on how to create an issue in the docs, if that's helpful.

[benjagm]

Hi @Sullivan-Tony-NASAC , the glossary is focusing on JSON Schema related features, not JSON I think there are a lot of JSON related terms and if we add all of them here, It would make it less useful in this context.

[Sullivan-Tony-NASAC]

Hi benjagm, As a user of the site, I totally disagree. It makes perfect sense for your glossary's entry for the term "JSON" to mention what it the acronym actually stands for since that is indeed part of its definition; actually, the first part of its definition. You do mention it elsewhere on your site in explaining JSON which is why it is odd to see it missing from the actual glossary. Regards, Tony Sullivan Assistant Director, Digital BPR Group ***@***.******@***.***> | Mobile: 615-305-6418 ***@***.******@***.***?anonymous&ep=bwmEmailSignature> Book time to meet with ***@***.***?anonymous&ep=bwmEmailSignature> ***@***.******@***.***> Chat with me on ***@***.***> From: Benjamin Granados ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 4:27 AM To: json-schema-org/website ***@***.***> Cc: Sullivan,TonyNASAD ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [json-schema-org/website] Update a glossary entry for JSON (Issue #1754) You don't often get email from ***@***.******@***.***>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/40007659?s=20&v=4]benjagm left a comment (json-schema-org/website#1754)<#1754 (comment)> Hi @Sullivan-Tony-NASAC<https://github.com/Sullivan-Tony-NASAC> , the glossary is focusing on JSON Schema related features, not JSON I think there are a lot of JSON related terms and if we add all of them here, It would make it less useful in this context. - Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1754 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BAIRE3YU5XY4EBYTLVRBH5T3GZCGFAVCNFSM6AAAAACAXDGBYKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTAMZVGE3DOMZSHE>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>