-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
feat(client): implement comprehensive has functionality for authoriza… #64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…tion checking Add complete authorization checking system with unified and individual methods: - Add individual authorization methods: has_roles?, has_permissions?, has_feature_flags?, has_billing_entitlements? - Add unified has() method supporting multiple condition types in single call - Implement complex conditions with Ruby blocks for custom authorization logic - Add force API parameter support (boolean and selective hash options) - Implement early exit optimization for improved performance - Add method aliases for cross-platform compatibility - Add comprehensive error handling with multi-level logging fallbacks - Support both symbol and string keys for flexible usage Features: - Empty array handling returns true (no constraints = allowed) - Single item and array parameter support - Custom role/permission/entitlement conditions with Ruby blocks - Graceful error handling with safe defaults - Performance-optimized early exit pattern - Force API controls for token vs fresh data usage Testing: - Add comprehensive test suite covering 100+ scenarios - Add real-world integration testing in starter kit - Add live user data validation testing - Cover all edge cases and error handling scenarios Implementation provides enterprise-grade authorization checking capabilities with Ruby-idiomatic patterns and production-ready error handling.
ZulqarnainNazir
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work 🎉 This PR introduces a powerful unified has() method with excellent examples, tests, and cross-SDK compatibility. The implementation is production-ready.
Strengths
- Comprehensive coverage (roles, permissions, flags, entitlements)
- Flexible force API parameter handling
- Early exit optimization for performance
- 191 lines of examples + dedicated test coverage
- Consistent with PHP/JS SDKs
Recommendations
has()method is long (~80 lines) → consider breaking into helper methods.- Add more granular error handling (API errors vs. argument errors).
- Potential performance gain via caching/memoization.
- Inline documentation/examples could make the API even clearer.
Verdict: High-quality PR 🚀 — just a few refactor and maintainability suggestions.
📊 Test Results Summary
| Component | Implementation | Documentation | Testing | Cross-SDK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Unified has() Method |
✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Complex Conditions | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Force API Control | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Examples File | ✅ | ✅ | N/A | ✅ |
| Test Coverage | ✅ | N/A | ✅ | N/A |
Overall Score: 5/5 components - EXCELLENT implementation
Key Metrics:
- Lines Added: 1,099 lines (comprehensive implementation)
- Files Changed: 6 files (well-organized changes)
- Examples: 191 lines of detailed usage examples
- Test Coverage: Dedicated test file included
- Cross-SDK Compatibility: Full PHP and JavaScript SDK support
Areas for Enhancement:
- Method Complexity: The
has()method could be refactored into smaller helper methods - Error Handling: Could be more granular for different error types
- Performance: Consider caching for frequently accessed authorization data
- Unit Testing: Could benefit from more granular unit tests
This PR significantly enhances the Ruby SDK's authorization capabilities with a sophisticated unified method. The implementation is production-ready and includes excellent documentation and examples. The complexity of the main method is the primary area for improvement.
🚀 Next Steps
- Refactor Method Complexity: Break the
has()method into smaller helper methods - Enhanced Error Handling: Add more granular error handling for different scenarios
- Performance Optimization: Consider caching strategies for authorization data
- Integration Testing: Test with real Kinde instances and complex scenarios
- Release Planning: Consider version bump and changelog updates
| rescue StandardError => e | ||
| log_error("Error in has method: #{e.message}") | ||
| false | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Error handling is good, but you might want to differentiate API errors vs. invalid arguments vs. unexpected exceptions. That way, debugging is easier in production.
| # | ||
| # @param force_api [Boolean, Hash, nil] Force API parameter | ||
| # @return [Hash] Parsed force_api settings | ||
| def parse_force_api_parameter(force_api) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice flexibility here 👏. One idea: memoize or cache results if this gets called frequently in a hot path, to avoid recomputing hash merges.
| # ] | ||
| # ) | ||
| # # => true | ||
| def has(conditions = {}, force_api = nil) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This method is ~80 lines and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking out role/permission/flag/entitlement checks into private helpers (e.g., check_roles_condition) for readability and testability
Has Functionality Implementation
This PR implements comprehensive authorization checking capabilities for the Ruby SDK.
What's Added
Core Methods:
Advanced Features:
Usage Examples
Simple checks
client.has_roles?(['admin', 'user'])
client.has_permissions?('read:users')
Unified authorization
client.has(
roles: ['admin'],
permissions: ['read:users'],
feature_flags: ['dark_mode']
)
Complex conditions
client.has_roles?([
'admin',
{ role: 'manager', condition: ->(r) { r[:level] == 'senior' } }
])