maxUnavailable for StatefulSets

[krmayankk]

Enhancement Description

• One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): Implement maxUnavailable for StatefulSets
• Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-apps/961-maxunavailable-for-statefulset/README.md
• Primary contact (assignee): @Edwinhr716
• Responsible SIGs: sig-apps
• Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
  • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.24
  • Beta release target (x.y): 1.35
  • Stable release target (x.y): TBD
• Alpha
  • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s): add initial KEP for maxUnavailable in StatefulSets #678 update proposal for maxUnavailable for statefulsets #1010 Add PRR information for maxUnavailable #2688 KEP: 961: Updating release info maxUnavailable for StatefulSet #2889 KEP-961: Update release information for maxUnavailable #3100
  • Code (k/k) update PR(s): API: maxUnavailable for StatefulSet kubernetes#82162
  • Docs (k/website) update PR(s): Document the MaxUnavailableStatefulSet feature website#32596
• Beta 1.34
  • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • KEP-961: Bump Statefulset maxUnavailable to beta #3997
    • KEP-961: Bump Statefulset maxUnavailable to beta (built on top of #3997) #4474
    • KEP-961: Bump Statefulset MaxUnavailable to beta (built on top of #4474) #5228
    • KEP-961: Update test links and metrics for beta release #5506
  • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Fix StatefulSetMinReadySeconds healthy concept kubernetes#130909
    • Adding metrics for Maxunavailable feature in StatefulSet kubernetes#130951
    • Add e2e test for MaxUnavailable StatefulSet RollingUpdate kubernetes#133717
    • Update MaxUnavailableStatefulSet feature gate to beta kubernetes#133153
  • Docs (k/website) update(s):

Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement

[krmayankk]

/sig auth

[krmayankk]

/assign @krmayankk

[krmayankk]

/milestone v1.15

[kacole2]

/stage alpha

[mrbobbytables]

@krmayankk should this be sig auth? The KEP itself refers to sig-apps.

[krmayankk]

@mrbobbytables no this is specific to sig-apps

[mrbobbytables]

@krmayankk it has the responsible sig list as sig-auth 'in the post and is labeled with auth.

• Responsible SIGs: sig-auth

Would you mind updating the issue?

Thanks!

/remove-sig auth
/sig apps