Skip to content

enforce retention policy on staging registries #8009

Open
@BenTheElder

Description

@BenTheElder

@upodroid mentioned he'd already announced that staging registries would have a 90d retention policy, some of them accumulated a LOT of content, and secondarily we're also seeing them used sometimes like "production" with end users being directed to (or choosing on their own) to pull directly from gcr.io/k8s-staging-foo even though these are meant to be project internal and do not give us flexibility to reroute load / costs unlike registry.k8s.io

This issue tracks rollout to any remaining projects, AIUI the projects with the most data had a policy enabled but not all of them yet.

/sig k8s-infra
/priority important-soon
/assign @upodroid

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

priority/important-soonMust be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.sig/k8s-infraCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions