From 1ffcf29c3c83f0e7e281dd848efa3258b9f1e593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Byrer <tomByrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:59:27 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] removed good example from bad example

hard to tell which example is throwing the compile error

Thanks for your project! :)
---
 pages/docs/docs.md | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pages/docs/docs.md b/pages/docs/docs.md
index ac0d7c6..6e64c08 100644
--- a/pages/docs/docs.md
+++ b/pages/docs/docs.md
@@ -1221,10 +1221,6 @@ That's because you often do see code like this:
 
 In LightScript, accessing an index or property using `[]` requires an indent:
 
-    node
-      .children
-      [0]
-
     node
     .children
     [0] // oops!
@@ -1233,10 +1229,6 @@ The required indent is relative to the line that starts a subscript chain.
 
 Note that this rule also applies to the "numerical index access" feature:
 
-    node
-      .children
-      .0
-
     node
     .children
     .0 // oops!