-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Refactor process append entry #7224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sciascid
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
refactor-process-append-entry
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
720f1d8 to
e83a660
Compare
MauriceVanVeen
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
e83a660 to
9c2a14f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possible to rebase on latest main and squash down to one commit please?
9c2a14f to
eedb125
Compare
Done |
Extract recoverAppendEntry() from processAppendEntry(), separating the normal path from recovery path. This allows to simplify processAppendEntry() by removing checks for for `sub == nil`, as subscription is always given Extract processAppendEntryLocked() from processAppendEntry(). processAppendEntryLocked() does the actual processing of the appendEntry under lock protection, and optionally returns a pointer to a appendEntryResponse. processAppendEntry() is responsible for sending the response and returning it to its pool (if any). Signed-off-by: Daniele Sciascia <[email protected]>
eedb125 to
acb54f1
Compare
705d478 to
98bac1f
Compare
Remove sub parameter from processAppendEntry, appendEntry already stores sub. Move all subscription pointer comparisons from processAppendEntryLocked to processAppendEntry. processAppendEntryLocked takes now a boolean instead of a subscription pointer. Signed-off-by: Daniele Sciascia <[email protected]>
98bac1f to
134258f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refactor processAppendEntry. Separate commits to simplify review, may be squashed later on.
Signed-off-by: Daniele [email protected]