[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-57318,OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025] #2646

jluhrsen · 2025-06-26T14:38:41Z

📑 Description

Fixes #

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

My code requires changes to the documentation
if so, I have updated the documentation as required
My code requires tests
if so, I have added and/or updated the tests as required
All the tests have passed in the CI

How to verify it

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <[email protected]>

This is the CRD for Network QoS, based on the enhancement ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#4366 Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

cd go-controller && ./hack/update-codegen.sh Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

This commit adds a new flag called enable-network-qos, which can be used to feature gate the Network QoS feature. The following flag is exposed in kind scripts as -nqe or --network-qos-enable: kind.sh -nqe kind-helm.sh -nqe Alternatively, it can be enabled via an exported shell variable: OVN_NETWORK_QOS_ENABLE=true kind.sh Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

This commit adds the preparation bits needed to be used by the network qos controller in the following commit. It also provides sufficient permissions to the systemaccount to list/watch/patch the new CRD accordingly. Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

This commit implements Network QoS controller, based on the enhancement ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#4366 Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

e2e skip test: Network QoS feature depends on multi-homing to exercise secondary NAD Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

misc changes to address review comments. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

use NetworkSelector spec to match net-attach-defs instead of explicitly specify a list of net-attach-defs. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_pod.go:9:2: import "k8s.io/api/core/v1" imported as "v1" but must be "corev1" according to config (importas) v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_test.go:547:26: Error return value of addrset.AddAddresses is not checked (errcheck) addrset.AddAddresses([]string{"10.194.188.4"}) ^ pkg/factory/factory_test.go:41: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(k8s.io,sigs.k8s.io) -s prefix(github.com/ovn-org) -s localmodule -s dot --custom-order (gci) "github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/util" pkg/factory/factory_test.go:44: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(k8s.io,sigs.k8s.io) -s prefix(github.com/ovn-org) -s localmodule -s dot --custom-order (gci) networkqosfake "github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/crd/networkqos/v1/apis/clientset/versioned/fake" pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_test.go:12: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(k8s.io,sigs.k8s.io) -s prefix(github.com/ovn-org) -s localmodule -s dot --custom-order (gci) . "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2" . "github.com/onsi/gomega" pkg/factory/factory_test.go:2160:21: unused-parameter: parameter 'old' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) UpdateFunc: func(old, new interface{}) { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos.go:70:43: unused-parameter: parameter 'nqosKey' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) return c.nqosCache.DoWithLock(key, func(nqosKey string) error { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos.go:84:43: unused-parameter: parameter 'nqosKey' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) return c.nqosCache.DoWithLock(key, func(nqosKey string) error { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos.go:91:42: unused-parameter: parameter 'nqosKey' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) return c.nqosCache.DoWithLock(key, func(nqosKey string) error { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/types.go:352:28: unused-parameter: parameter 'value' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) dest.Pods.Range(func(key, value any) bool { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_test.go:906:12: unused-parameter: parameter 'nbGlobal' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) p := func(nbGlobal *nbdb.NBGlobal) bool { ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_controller.go:9:2: import "k8s.io/api/core/v1" imported as "v1" but must be "corev1" according to config (importas) v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" ^ level=info msg="[runner/max_same_issues] 14/17 issues with text "File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(k8s.io,sigs.k8s.io) -s prefix(github.com/ovn-org) -s localmodule -s dot --custom-order" were hidden, use --max-same-issues" level=info msg="[runner/max_same_issues] 2/5 issues with text "import \"k8s.io/api/core/v1\" imported as \"v1\" but must be \"corev1\" according to config" were hidden, use --max-same-issues" level=info msg="[runner] Issues before processing: 154, after processing: 15" level=info msg="[runner] Processors filtering stat (out/in): invalid_issue: 154/154, path_prettifier: 154/154, max_same_issues: 15/31, severity-rules: 15/15, path_prefixer: 15/15, filename_unadjuster: 154/154, identifier_marker: 104/104, source_code: 15/15, cgo: 154/154, exclude: 104/104, exclude-rules: 34/104, diff: 31/31, max_from_linter: 15/15, fixer: 15/15, sort_results: 15/15, skip_files: 154/154, autogenerated_exclude: 104/113, nolint: 31/34, uniq_by_line: 31/31, max_per_file_from_linter: 31/31, path_shortener: 15/15, skip_dirs: 113/154" level=info msg="[runner] processing took 20.696604ms with stages: nolint: 9.359103ms, path_prettifier: 4.425669ms, autogenerated_exclude: 3.521318ms, source_code: 1.252048ms, exclude-rules: 986.811µs, identifier_marker: 704.888µs, skip_dirs: 394.602µs, max_same_issues: 15.034µs, cgo: 9.933µs, invalid_issue: 7.606µs, uniq_by_ line: 6.214µs, path_shortener: 4.436µs, filename_unadjuster: 3.748µs, max_from_linter: 3.014µs, max_per_file_from_linter: 672ns, fixer: 346ns, skip_files: 311ns, diff: 231ns, exclude: 218ns, sort_results: 204ns, severity-rules: 104ns, path_prefixer: 94ns" level=info msg="[runner] linters took 16.440293927s with stages: goanalysis_metalinter: 16.419554906s" level=info msg="File cache stats: 8 entries of total size 176.9KiB" level=info msg="Memory: 431 samples, avg is 1072.1MB, max is 4950.4MB" level=info msg="Execution took 43.614943666s" pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_namespace.go:8:2: import "k8s.io/api/core/v1" imported as "v1" but must be "corev1" according to config (importas) v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_node.go:10:2: import "k8s.io/api/core/v1" imported as "v1" but must be "corev1" according to config (importas) v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/network_qos_ovnnb.go:10:2: import "github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/ovsdb" imported as "libovsdb" but must be "" according to config (importas) libovsdb "github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/ovsdb" ^ pkg/ovn/controller/network_qos/types.go:13:2: import "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors" imported without alias but must be with alias "apierrors" according to config (importas) "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors" ^ Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

change `port` in classifier to `ports` which contains a list of protocol&port combinations. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

cd go-controller && ./hack/update-codegen.sh Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Tests: - host networked pod -> nodeport -> ovnk backend (UDP) - VM (1500 mtu) -> host networked pod on another node (TCP) - ovnk pod -> host networked pod on another node (UDP) Each of these test would trigger a node to install a lower MTU route in its cache towards another node, due to PMTUD. The test fails if it detects such a route. Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <[email protected]>

Create nftables rules to block sending ICMP needs frag/packet too big for known Kubernetes node IPs. PMTUD between nodes can be deterimental to the cluster. Note, this does not affect PMTUD messages received from an intermediary router. For shared gateway mode, also install openflow rules to drop needs frag packets from OVN GR that are destined to known kubernetes nodes. Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <[email protected]>

This test works under the premise that sending UDP packets via netcat would trigger ICMP needs frag. For shared gateway mode, packets to a host networked pod endpoint are not fragmented and are rerouted out of GR back to the next host endpoint. However, for OVN networked endpoints and shared gateway mode, the packet will hit the GR and then even if DF bit is not set, OVN GR will send back an ICMP needs frag (because OVS is incapable of fragmentation across different MTU boundary interfaces). For local gateway mode, large packets that hit an intermediary node are DNAT'ed in iptables to the cluster IP service. Then there is a route for cluster IP service set to 1400 byte MTU. This will trigger the kernel to drop the packet when DF bit is set. Since our new logic prevents ICMP needs frag from installing a cached MTU route, the client will continue to send packets with a 1500 byte MTU and they will be dropped. We choose not to fix this for now as it was identified as not a practical use case: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-7609 It could be fixed in the future by using an ip rule to match on nodeport port range, and then redirecting traffic to another routing table with a lower MTU on the route. Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <[email protected]>

This allows ovn_cluster_router to send ICMP needs frag when too large of a packet is sent from a pod (such as from a kubevirt VM with too large an MTU). See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-1295 for more details. Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <[email protected]>

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVS it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners constantly flagging this image with poor security grades. OVS package inside the container is responsible for the following: 1. Command line utilities to talk with OVS from the host. 2. ovsdb-server processes serving OVN databases. 3. ovs-monitor-ipsec script for managing ipsec configuration on OVN tunnels. These tools/programs are not changing that much between patch releases, and bug fix releases in FDP are going through a lot of testing before becoming available in the repo. So, benefits of timely delivery of bug and CVE fixes significantly outweighs the small risks that automatic consumption of new builds incurs. Main OVS is working on the host and follows FDP for a very long time now, and it's also better to keep the minor versions between host and container in sync, just to decrease the amount of variables in the system. Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>

Today, we require that VF accelerated gateway interface must be explicitly configured. This change allows VF based accelerated gateway interface without explict configuration. Signed-off-by: Yun Zhou <[email protected]>

- namespace/pod/node handlers detect possible changes and trigger reconciliation by putting networkqos in event queue. - reconcile networkqos rules in networkqos handler only Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

Guard against PMTUD route caching for Kubernetes Node IPs

Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

- acquire lock on the start in networkqos handler - add missing DeepEqual check in networkqos event handler Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

Add Support for Network QoS

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

martinkennelly · 2025-07-08T10:09:55Z

/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-57318,OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025]

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-07-08T10:10:06Z

@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57318, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57317 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57317 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @Meina-rh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.18.z" version, but no target version was set
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

📑 Description

Fixes #

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

My code requires changes to the documentation

if so, I have updated the documentation as required

My code requires tests

if so, I have added and/or updated the tests as required

All the tests have passed in the CI

How to verify it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

martinkennelly · 2025-07-08T10:10:44Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-07-08T10:10:50Z

@martinkennelly: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57318, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57317 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57317 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @Meina-rh

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

tssurya · 2025-07-09T12:48:46Z

@jluhrsen : were payloads also green here? are we good to go with this one?
the multi-PR job is red

jluhrsen · 2025-07-09T16:45:40Z

@jluhrsen : were payloads also green here? are we good to go with this one? the multi-PR job is red

yes payloads were good. see this comment. we needed one re-run which was fine. see this comment.

the multi-pr job did not work at all. no clue why. I only did it hoping to prove this PR was ok and we just needed the origin PRs to land so the aws-ovn-edge-zones would pass, but they ended up landing in the meantime and the re-run of that job did pass.

we need /approve /lgtm and /backport-risk-assessed labels

tssurya · 2025-07-09T17:11:14Z

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed
/approve

openshift-ci · 2025-07-09T17:11:56Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jluhrsen, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [tssurya]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-07-09T17:15:42Z

@jluhrsen: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57318: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57318 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2646

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58159 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

📑 Description

Fixes #

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

My code requires changes to the documentation

if so, I have updated the documentation as required

My code requires tests

if so, I have added and/or updated the tests as required

All the tests have passed in the CI

How to verify it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-bot · 2025-07-09T22:18:06Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ovn-kubernetes-base
This PR has been included in build ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container-v4.18.0-202507092034.p0.g5a7022b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-07-09T22:57:14Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ovn-kubernetes-microshift
This PR has been included in build ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container-v4.18.0-202507092034.p0.g5a7022b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-07-09T23:24:16Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-ovn-kubernetes
This PR has been included in build ose-ovn-kubernetes-container-v4.18.0-202507092034.p0.g5a7022b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-merge-robot · 2025-07-10T13:41:35Z

Fix included in accepted release 4.18.0-0.nightly-2025-07-10-031259

tssurya and others added 30 commits April 22, 2025 22:56

Add Nadia Pinaeva to maintainer's list

1688916

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <[email protected]>

NetworkQoS CRD

b07f226

This is the CRD for Network QoS, based on the enhancement ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#4366 Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

update-codegen.sh: be aware of crd version

8e5ad2b

Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

generated crd from update-codegen.sh

964c66e

cd go-controller && ./hack/update-codegen.sh Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Implement NetworkQoS controller

1efaf29

This commit implements Network QoS controller, based on the enhancement ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#4366 Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

add e2e tests for networkqos

98d4ceb

Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

gh, actions: Set OVN_NETWORK_QOS_ENABLE in control-plane jobs

606206f

e2e skip test: Network QoS feature depends on multi-homing to exercise secondary NAD Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

address review comments.

9770cb1

misc changes to address review comments. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

Update networkqos okep to reflect latest changes from code review

c561de8

Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

networkqos: use NetworkSelector to match net-attach-defs (#8)

a373249

use NetworkSelector spec to match net-attach-defs instead of explicitly specify a list of net-attach-defs. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

NetworkQoS: support multiple ports in one classifier

7ec0249

change `port` in classifier to `ports` which contains a list of protocol&port combinations. Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

update crd from update-codegen.sh

ef217b1

cd go-controller && ./hack/update-codegen.sh Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <[email protected]>

ovs client shouldn't be initialized on DPU Hosts

4dcedbe

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

Merge pull request #5153 from trozet/enforce_mtu_from_pod

739798b

Guard against PMTUD route caching for Kubernetes Node IPs

revert to use string key for networkqos

21fd64a

Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

address review comments on networkqos

de53833

- acquire lock on the start in networkqos handler - add missing DeepEqual check in networkqos event handler Signed-off-by: Xiaobin Qu <[email protected]>

Merge pull request #4508 from flavio-fernandes/networkqos-design

76bf584

Add Support for Network QoS

OVN IC mode should handle user set encapIPs

d1bbbab

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

Update IC tests for encap records insertion and deletion

98a016a

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

Add createorupdatechassis tests

fbe5bea

Signed-off-by: nithyar <[email protected]>

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025]~~ [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-57318,OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025] Jul 8, 2025

openshift-ci bot requested a review from Meina-rh July 8, 2025 10:10

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jul 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot assigned anuragthehatter, asood-rh, huiran0826, jechen0648, Meina-rh, mffiedler, qiowang721, rbbratta, weliang1 and yingwang-0320 Jul 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 9, 2025

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5a7022b into openshift:release-4.18 Jul 9, 2025
42 of 47 checks passed

igsilya mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2025

[openshift-4.18] CORENET-5975: ovn-kubernetes: Remove exemptions for now unpinned OVS rpms. openshift-eng/ocp-build-data#7226

Merged

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-57318,OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025] #2646

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-57318,OCPBUGS-58159: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [06-26-2025] #2646

Uh oh!

Conversation

jluhrsen commented Jun 26, 2025

📑 Description

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

How to verify it

Uh oh!

martinkennelly commented Jul 8, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2025

📑 Description

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

How to verify it

Uh oh!

martinkennelly commented Jul 8, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2025

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

jluhrsen commented Jul 9, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2025

📑 Description

Additional Information for reviewers

✅ Checks

How to verify it

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Jul 10, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

30 participants

jluhrsen commented Jul 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading