DOC: Add missing periods in DataFrame docstrings

[deepith-18]

This PR adds a missing period to the numeric_only parameter in the DataFrame.count docstring, improving documentation consistency.

[x] xref #58063 (addresses one small part of the parent issue)

[x] All code checks passed.

[simonjayhawkins]

Thanks @deepith-18 for the PR

• closes DOC: Enforce Numpy Docstring Validation (Parent Issue) #58063 (addresses one small part of the parent issue)

if the PR only addresses a part and does not close the linked issue, please use xref instead of closes otherwise merging this PR will automatically close the linked issue.

[deepith-18]

Thanks @deepith-18 for the PR

• closes DOC: Enforce Numpy Docstring Validation (Parent Issue) #58063 (addresses one small part of the parent issue)

if the PR only addresses a part and does not close the linked issue, please use xref instead of closes otherwise merging this PR will automatically close the linked issue.

Thanks for the great feedback, @simonjayhawkins! I have updated the PR description to use xref instead of closes to correctly reference the parent issue, as you suggested. Please let me know if any other changes are needed.

[simonjayhawkins]

the ci is reporting

Error: /home/runner/work/pandas/pandas/pandas/core/frame.py:11766:PR05:pandas.DataFrame.count:Parameter "numeric_only" type should not finish with "."

So the periods that need to be added are for the longer descriptions

What were the errors reported by

scripts/validate_docstrings.py --format=actions

that this PR is fixing?

[deepith-18]

Thanks for the detailed feedback and clarification, @simonjayhawkins! My apologies, I added the period to the wrong line. I've now moved it to the end of the longer description as you suggested.

[simonjayhawkins]

This PR adds a missing period to the numeric_only parameter in the DataFrame.count docstring, improving documentation consistency.

if you do on main

scripts/validate_docstrings.py --format=actions pandas.DataFrame.count

you get

Docstring for "pandas.DataFrame.count" correct. :)

so closing this one. Please feel free to take another method listed in #58063