Apply suggestion from @ywwg

Co-authored-by: Owen Williams <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <[email protected]>

Author: bwplotka

proposals/0060-ct-storage.md

@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ We propose to have a single flag for both WAL, Block storage, etc., to avoid tri
 
 Notably, given persistence of this feature, similar to examplar storage, if users enable and then disable this feature, users might be able to access their CTs through all already persistent pieces e.g. WAL).
 
-This feature could be considered to be switched to opt-out, only after it's finished (this proposal is fully implemented) stable, provably adopted and when the previous LTS Prometheus version is compatible with this feature.
+This feature could be considered to be switched to opt-out only after it's stable (i.e., this proposal is fully implemented), provably adopted and when the previous LTS Prometheus version is compatible with this feature.
 
 ### Proposed CT semantics and validation