@@ -3,11 +3,21 @@ Title: Range Literals
3
3
Author: Thomas Wouters <
[email protected] >
4
4
Status: Rejected
5
5
Type: Standards Track
6
- Content-Type: text/x-rst
7
6
Created: 14-Jul-2000
8
7
Python-Version: 2.0
9
8
Post-History:
10
9
10
+ .. rejected ::
11
+ After careful consideration, and a period of meditation, this
12
+ proposal has been rejected. The open issues, as well as some
13
+ confusion between ranges and slice syntax, raised enough questions
14
+ for Guido not to accept it for Python 2.0, and later to reject the
15
+ proposal altogether. The new syntax and its intentions were deemed
16
+ not obvious enough.
17
+
18
+ [ TBD: Guido, amend/confirm this, please. Preferably both; this
19
+ is a PEP, it should contain *all * the reasons for rejection
20
+ and/or reconsideration, for future reference. ]
11
21
12
22
Introduction
13
23
============
@@ -270,21 +280,6 @@ Open issues
270
280
made private functions?
271
281
272
282
273
- Rejection
274
- =========
275
-
276
- After careful consideration, and a period of meditation, this
277
- proposal has been rejected. The open issues, as well as some
278
- confusion between ranges and slice syntax, raised enough questions
279
- for Guido not to accept it for Python 2.0, and later to reject the
280
- proposal altogether. The new syntax and its intentions were deemed
281
- not obvious enough.
282
-
283
- [ TBD: Guido, amend/confirm this, please. Preferably both; this
284
- is a PEP, it should contain *all * the reasons for rejection
285
- and/or reconsideration, for future reference. ]
286
-
287
-
288
283
Copyright
289
284
=========
290
285
0 commit comments