Support CoAP

[michaelklishin]

We should support CoAP, which is an IoT-focused protocol that is quite different from what we currently cover.

TBD: specifics.

[johnfoldager]

+1

[carlhoerberg]

Are you thinking that it would work like a proxy for CoAP servers or?

[michaelklishin]

Specific features are debatable. I've filed this as an indication that we'd like to support CoAP (and more protocols) in the future.

[michaelklishin]

Relevant: https://github.com/gotthardp/rabbitmq-coap-pubsub.

[gfoiani]

+1

[BlueBeN82]

+1

[michaelplaing]

The gotthardp COAP implementation would be more useful if it used bindings on a common topic exchange rather than distinct exchanges for topics. The current COAP implementation makes it difficult to interoperate with the RabbitMQ MQTT implementation, a desirable goal IMHO.

[michaelklishin]

@michaelplaing please post this to rabbitmq-users or file an issue so that @gotthardp can see your feedback ;)

[michaelplaing]

done :)

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Michael Klishin notifications@github.com
wrote:

@michaelplaing https://github.com/michaelplaing please post this to
rabbitmq-users or file an issue so that @gotthardp
https://github.com/gotthardp can see your feedback ;)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#89 (comment)
.

[mwmw7]

+1

[johnfoldager]

+1

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:13 PM, hosup choi notifications@github.com
wrote:

+1

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#89 (comment)