Skip to content

Commit 0590c49

Browse files
authored
remove wrong claim
A return type for a test function is not always required to be a unit type
1 parent 9e16912 commit 0590c49

File tree

1 file changed

+0
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+0
-3
lines changed

src/attributes.rst

Lines changed: 0 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2069,9 +2069,6 @@ Attribute ``test``
20692069
* :dp:`fls_aqzd30s267pt`
20702070
Lacks :t:`[function parameter]s`, and
20712071

2072-
* :dp:`fls_n3hjhh3d7tyx`
2073-
Its :t:`return type` is the :t:`unit type`.
2074-
20752072
:dp:`fls_ze6cs75y9aft`
20762073
:t:`Attribute` :dc:`test` indicates that the respective :t:`function` is a
20772074
:dt:`testing function`.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)