Add in-place initialization goal

Author: Darksonn

src/2025h2/in-place-initialization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+# In-place initialization
+
+| Metadata         |                                                                                  |
+|:-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Point of contact | @Darksonn                                                                        |
+| Teams            | <!-- TEAMS WITH ASKS -->                                                         |
+| Task owners      | <!-- TASK OWNERS -->                                                             |
+| Status           | Proposed                                                                         |
+| Tracking issue   |                                                                                  |
+| Zulip channel    | [#t-lang][channel]                                                               |
+
+[channel]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/213817-t-lang
+
+## Summary
+
+Evaluate approaches for in-place initialization and pick one.
+
+## Motivation
+
+This project goal aims to find an ergonomic mechanism for in-place
+initialization so that we can add it to the language.
+
+### The status quo
+
+There are multiple projects that are running into various problems that can only
+be solved using a mechanism for in-place initialization. Each project has
+implemented their own independent and slightly different solution in external
+crates relying on complex macros at the cost of ergonomics.
+
+It's time to learn from the extensive amount of experimentation in the ecosystem
+and create a language feature that provides a shared solution that can be more
+ergonomic than what is possible in an external crate.
+
+#### Current proposals and implementations
+
+* [Init expressions] were proposed by [Alice Ryhl] based on work originally by
+  [Benno Lossin] and [Gary Guo].
+* [Initialization via out-ptrs] was proposed by [Taylor Cramer]. 
+* [Placing functions] were proposed by [Yoshua Wuyts].
+* The [Placement by return] RFC was opened in 2020 by [Olivier Faure].
+* For the Linux Kernel, there is the [pin-init] crate.
+* For C++ interop, there is the [moveit] crate, and the descendent [Ctor] trait
+  from Crubit.
+* There is already an [open lang experiement][lang-experiment] on init
+  expressions and supporting async fn in dyn trait, which is being implemented
+  by [Michael Goulet] and [Ding Xiang Fei].
+
+[Init expressions]: https://hackmd.io/@aliceryhl/BJutRcPblx
+[Initialization via out-ptrs]: https://hackmd.io/awB-GOYJRlua9Cuc0a3G-Q
+[Placing functions]: https://blog.yoshuawuyts.com/placing-functions/
+[Placement by return]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2884
+[Alice Ryhl]: https://github.com/Darksonn
+[Benno Lossin]: https://github.com/BennoLossin
+[Gary Guo]: https://github.com/nbdd0121
+[Taylor Cramer]: https://github.com/cramertj
+[Yoshua Wuyts]: https://github.com/yoshuawuyts
+[Olivier Faure]: https://github.com/PoignardAzur
+[pin-init]: https://github.com/rust-for-linux/pin-init
+[moveit]: https://docs.rs/moveit/latest/moveit/new/trait.New.html
+[Ctor]: https://github.com/google/crubit/blob/c65afa7b2923a2d4c9528f16f7bfd4aef6c80b86/support/ctor.rs#L189-L226
+[lang-experiment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/336
+[Michael Goulet]: https://github.com/compiler-errors
+[Ding Xiang Fei]: https://github.com/dingxiangfei2009
+
+### The next 6 months
+
+Today, there are multiple different competing proposals for how in-place
+initialization should work. For the next 6 months, the primary aim of this goal
+is to figure out which proposal (or combination of proposals!) is best and pick
+one.
+
+There may also be some amount of experimentation with the proposals as part of
+the lang experiment. This may also involve experiments to refactor e.g. the
+Linux Kernel or Crubit to use a proposal to see how well it works in the real
+world. Actually attempting to land the feature is out of scope for the next six
+months.
+
+### The "shiny future" we are working towards
+
+In the shiny future, Rust will be a language that supports in-place
+initialization in a way that is efficient, ergonomic, easy-to-use. The language
+may utilize in-place initialization to provide the following five features:
+
+#### Avoid stack overflow when creating values on the heap
+
+When creating a boxed value, in-place initialization allows you to construct the
+value in-place directly in the location on the heap. This avoids stack overflow
+crashes when the value is large.
+
+#### C++ interop
+
+Most values in C++ are not trivially relocatable. This means that you must run
+user-defined code (the move constructor) to move them from one address to
+another. Pinned in-place initialization provides a natural way to translate C++
+constructors into Rust.
+
+#### Constructors returning pinned values
+
+When interacting with C code such as the Linux kernel, constructors for C types
+often take an out pointer to initialize the value in. It's usually not safe to
+memcpy the resulting C value to a different location, which means that the value
+must be pinned immediately on creation. By using pinned in-place initialization,
+it is natural to work with this kind of value in Rust.
+
+For this to be ergonomic, it's important that you can embed these values as
+fields in your own Rust structs, and that initialization can be fallible.
+
+#### Async fn in dyn Trait
+
+Trait objects can have async functions. When an async function is called, the
+future is initialized in-place into a user-provided location. The same feature
+also extends to other `-> impl Trait` return types in trait objects.
+
+The same feature could potentially extend to any function returning an unsized
+type.
+
+#### Custom self-referential types
+
+In the constructor for your custom struct, you know the final address of each
+field, so you can safely create a situation where one field borrows from another
+field. Since the struct being initialized is immediately pinned, there is no
+risk that the caller will memcpy the value to a different location and
+invalidate internal references.
+
+## Design axioms
+
+We must remember to **take advantage of the language**. It has already been
+proven multiple times that in-place initialization can be implemented in an
+external crate with macros. Are there any possible ergonomics wins that are
+possible only by adding a real language feature?
+
+## Ownership and team asks
+
+Since the primary objective of this project goal is to choose a solution, this
+project goals asks the lang-team for *two* design meetings. There is already [a
+meeting scheduled on July 30th][design-meeting], which is at the beginning of
+the goal period. This project goal asks the lang team for a second meeting near
+the end of the goal period, in addition to the one that has already been
+scheduled.
+
+[design-meeting]: https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/332
+
+| Task                         | Owner(s) or team(s)                   | Notes |
+|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------|
+| Discussion and moral support | ![Team][] [lang]                      |       |
+| Two design meetings          | ![Team][] [lang]                      |       |
+| Be the main author of an RFC | @Darksonn                             |       |
+| Contribute to the RFC        | @cramertj, @yoshuawuyts, @BennoLossin, @nbdd0121 |       |
+| Lang-team liason             | @joshtriplett                         |       |
+| Dedicated reviewer           | @compiler-errors                      | Of lang experiments |
+