Additional <operators/constructors> Needed

[leasoncre]

Request: additional functional operators needed for some use-cases:
Please add a function for:
<> (not equal to, opposite of "=" (or "!="))

ex:
currently I cannot test a string that changes constantly,
or have a set of commands run if the value returns false for the statement:
some placeholders can't be checked for an exact string value, but can be tested for a null/empty value
%luckperms_expiry_time_essentials.fly% returns a time value, but as a string ex:"1h 5m 3s"

add <if> placeholder:%luckperms_expiry_time_essentials.fly%<>""
add <msg> time remaining: %luckperms_expiry_time_essentials.fly%
add <endif>
add <msg> always msg

#==================lower priority/later on:
PS. can PAPI numerical values be tested for multiple values (with OR) the same way strings can?
ex: placeholder:%papi_value%=2|=4|=6 #(no spaces)
Is there an AND function?
ex: placeholder:%papi_value%=2 && %papi_value2%=test
or a multiple OR test on a single line?
ex: placeholder:%papi_value%=2 || %papi_value2%=test

There is a PlaceholderAPI MATH function that can do math functions with EvalEX, but that won't test multiple placeholders things in one statement. :/

Thank you.

[EpiCanard]

Hello :)

You can already reverse a condition with <if> [!]conditional operator key:parameters

Prefixing an operator key with ! will make that conditional check negative, so it will execute its block if the condition is FALSE rather than TRUE.

So why adding a new operator if you can just reverse the conditon ?

====
For papi you can already compare number with OR
placeholder:%papi_value%=2|4|6

For the AND and OR for multiple placeholder I thinks if it's added it should be available for every operator so maybe a new conditional types can be a good idea like and that can be used if it has an just above

[leasoncre]

Hello :)
You can already reverse a condition with <if> [!]conditional operator key:parameters
Prefixing an operator key with ! will make that conditional check negative, so it will execute its block if the condition is FALSE rather than TRUE.
So why adding a new operator if you can just reverse the conditon ?

oh, i completely missed it.
A conditional IF statement is defined in this format: <if> [!]conditional operator key:parameters
I was looking in the BOLD ($) notes below the table for operators. :/
might? still be a need for it later? unknown. This should work just fine though. (main issue solved)

====
For papi you can already compare number with OR
placeholder:%papi_value%=2|4|6

For the AND and OR for multiple placeholder I thinks if it's added it should be available for every operator so maybe a new conditional types can be a good idea like and that can be used if it has an just above

For numbers, yes, but i was asking about STRINGS/text.
"if it has an just above"???? #typos ><
sounds good :)

Thank you.

[EpiCanard]

For numbers, yes, but i was asking about STRINGS/text.

You can do the same with strings :)

"if it has an just above"???? #typos ><

a new conditional types can be a good idea like <or> and <and> that can be used if it has an <if> just above

Not typos, just github that interprets <>