diff --git a/anchor/common/qbft/src/tests.rs b/anchor/common/qbft/src/tests.rs
index a607b5c9b..74dd49084 100644
--- a/anchor/common/qbft/src/tests.rs
+++ b/anchor/common/qbft/src/tests.rs
@@ -223,3 +223,184 @@ fn test_node_recovery() {
     let num_consensus = test_instance.wait_until_end();
     assert_eq!(num_consensus, 5); // Should reach full consensus after recovery
 }
+
+#[test]
+/// Test that verifies QBFT can achieve consensus when commit messages arrive before proposal
+///
+/// This test simulates a realistic catch-up scenario in distributed systems where a node
+/// receives commit messages from other nodes before receiving the original proposal.
+/// According to QBFT specification, if we have:
+/// 1. A valid proposal for value X
+/// 2. A quorum of commit messages for value X
+///
+/// Then we should achieve consensus on value X, regardless of message arrival order.
+///
+/// Current bug: This test FAILS because commit messages are dropped instead of buffered,
+/// preventing consensus achievement in out-of-order scenarios.
+fn test_consensus_with_commits_before_proposal() {
+    if ENABLE_TEST_LOGGING {
+        let env_filter = EnvFilter::new("debug");
+        let _ = tracing_subscriber::fmt()
+            .compact()
+            .with_env_filter(env_filter)
+            .try_init();
+    }
+
+    use ssv_types::{
+        consensus::QbftMessage,
+        message::{MsgType, RSA_SIGNATURE_SIZE, SSVMessage, SignedSSVMessage},
+    };
+
+    // Create QBFT instance with 4 nodes (f=1, quorum=3)
+    let config = ConfigBuilder::<DefaultLeaderFunction>::new(
+        1.into(),
+        InstanceHeight::default(),
+        (1..=4).map(OperatorId::from).collect(), // 4 nodes, quorum = 3
+    )
+    .with_operator_id(OperatorId::from(1))
+    .build()
+    .expect("config should be valid");
+
+    let test_data = TestData(789);
+    let mut qbft_instance = Qbft::new(
+        config,
+        test_data.clone(),
+        Box::new(NoDataValidation),
+        MessageId::from([0; 56]),
+        |_| {},
+    );
+
+    // Verify initial state: no proposal accepted, no consensus
+    assert!(!qbft_instance.proposal_accepted_for_current_round);
+    assert!(matches!(
+        qbft_instance.state,
+        InstanceState::AwaitingProposal
+    ));
+    assert!(qbft_instance.completed.is_none());
+
+    // STEP 1: Send commit messages FIRST (out-of-order scenario)
+    // This simulates receiving commits from other nodes before seeing the proposal
+    println!("Sending commit messages before proposal...");
+
+    for operator_id in [2, 3, 4] {
+        // From operators 2, 3, 4 (not from leader 1)
+        let commit_msg = QbftMessage {
+            qbft_message_type: QbftMessageType::Commit,
+            height: 0,
+            round: 1,
+            identifier: [0; 56].to_vec().into(),
+            root: test_data.hash(),
+            data_round: 0,
+            round_change_justification: vec![],
+            prepare_justification: vec![],
+        };
+
+        let commit_ssv_message = SSVMessage::new(
+            MsgType::SSVConsensusMsgType,
+            MessageId::from([0; 56]),
+            commit_msg.as_ssz_bytes(),
+        )
+        .expect("should create commit SSVMessage");
+
+        let signed_commit = SignedSSVMessage::new(
+            vec![vec![0; RSA_SIGNATURE_SIZE]],
+            vec![OperatorId::from(operator_id)],
+            commit_ssv_message,
+            vec![], // no full_data for commit
+        )
+        .expect("should create signed commit");
+
+        let wrapped_commit = WrappedQbftMessage {
+            signed_message: signed_commit,
+            qbft_message: commit_msg,
+        };
+
+        // Send the commit message - should be buffered for later processing
+        qbft_instance.receive(wrapped_commit);
+    }
+
+    // After commits, should still be awaiting proposal (no consensus yet)
+    assert!(matches!(
+        qbft_instance.state,
+        InstanceState::AwaitingProposal
+    ));
+    assert!(qbft_instance.completed.is_none());
+
+    // STEP 2: Now send the proposal (completing the consensus scenario)
+    println!("Sending proposal after commits...");
+
+    let proposal = QbftMessage {
+        qbft_message_type: QbftMessageType::Proposal,
+        height: 0,
+        round: 1,
+        identifier: [0; 56].to_vec().into(),
+        root: test_data.hash(),
+        data_round: 0,
+        round_change_justification: vec![],
+        prepare_justification: vec![],
+    };
+
+    let proposal_ssv_message = SSVMessage::new(
+        MsgType::SSVConsensusMsgType,
+        MessageId::from([0; 56]),
+        proposal.as_ssz_bytes(),
+    )
+    .expect("should create proposal SSVMessage");
+
+    let signed_proposal = SignedSSVMessage::new(
+        vec![vec![0; RSA_SIGNATURE_SIZE]],
+        vec![OperatorId::from(1)], // From leader (operator 1)
+        proposal_ssv_message,
+        test_data.as_ssz_bytes(), // full_data for proposal
+    )
+    .expect("should create signed proposal");
+
+    let wrapped_proposal = WrappedQbftMessage {
+        signed_message: signed_proposal,
+        qbft_message: proposal,
+    };
+
+    // Send the proposal - this should trigger re-evaluation of buffered commits
+    qbft_instance.receive(wrapped_proposal);
+
+    // STEP 3: Verify consensus is achieved with correct value
+    // After receiving the proposal, the instance should:
+    // 1. Accept the proposal
+    // 2. Re-evaluate buffered commit messages
+    // 3. Detect commit quorum (3 commits for same value)
+    // 4. Achieve consensus with Success(test_data.hash())
+
+    println!("Verifying consensus achievement...");
+
+    // Should have accepted the proposal
+    assert!(
+        qbft_instance.proposal_accepted_for_current_round,
+        "Proposal should be accepted after receiving it"
+    );
+
+    // Should have achieved consensus with the correct value
+    assert!(
+        qbft_instance.completed.is_some(),
+        "BUG: Instance should have completed consensus after receiving proposal + buffered commits. \
+         Current behavior drops commit messages when received before proposal, preventing \
+         consensus in out-of-order scenarios."
+    );
+
+    // Verify the consensus result is correct
+    if let Some(completed) = qbft_instance.completed {
+        assert!(
+            matches!(completed, Completed::Success(hash) if hash == test_data.hash()),
+            "Consensus should succeed with the correct data hash. Got: {:?}, Expected: Success({})",
+            completed,
+            hex::encode(test_data.hash())
+        );
+    }
+
+    // Should be in Complete state
+    assert!(
+        matches!(qbft_instance.state, InstanceState::Complete),
+        "Instance should be in Complete state after achieving consensus"
+    );
+
+    println!("SUCCESS: Consensus achieved correctly despite out-of-order message delivery!");
+}