while(y.t<ys) y.(y.t++, 0);

[makc]

This is really crazy code that breaks many parsers. Do you think you could change it to original?

while(y.t < ys) y[y.t++] = 0;

[timkurvers]

Thanks! Will hopefully get around to this soon as it's on the upstream task list too: #56.

I'm still unsure how that piece of code actually compiles properly.

[makc]

Whenever I try to do this in my own code, it compiles fine but throws RTE:

TypeError: Error #1123: Filter operator not supported on type Foo.

The compiler does not bother to check if e4x is applicable, but vm does. So I guess the only reasonable explanation for this is that BigInteger's divRemTo() method is never actually used.

[makc]

...or while condition is always false.

[wudixiaozi135]

I want to know which style of writing is right.
" while(y.t < ys) y[y.t++] = 0" is right or wrong.
I hope you will reply as soon as.

[hypergeome]

It should be
while(y.t<ys) y.a[y.t++] = 0;

[wudixiaozi135]

many thanks