All technologies.
-The objective of this technique is to describe the failure that occurs when - an image uses color differences to convey information, but the text alternative for the - image does not convey that information. This can cause problems for people - who are blind or colorblind because they will not be able to perceive the - information conveyed by the color differences.
-For all images in the content that convey information by way of color differences:
The hypertext links in a document are medium-light blue (#3366CC) and the regular text is black (#000000). Beyond the difference in color, the links have no other styles differences compared with the regular text. Because the blue text is light enough, it has a contrast of 3.9:1 with the surrounding text and can be identified as being different from the surrounding text by people with all types of color blindness, including those individuals who cannot see color at all. In addition to the contrast difference, the links have :focus and :hover styles that reintroduce the underline when the links receive keyboard focus or when a mouse pointer hovers over them. Hover or focus style changes alone are not sufficient to meet the criterion.
The hypertext links in a document are medium-light blue (#3366CC) and the regular text is black (#000000). Beyond the difference in color, the links have no other styles differences compared with the regular text. Because the blue text is light enough, it has a contrast of 3.9:1 with the surrounding text and can be identified as being different from the surrounding text by people with all types of color vision deficiency, including those individuals who cannot see color at all. In addition to the contrast difference, the links have :focus and :hover styles that reintroduce the underline when the links receive keyboard focus or when a mouse pointer hovers over them. Hover or focus style changes alone are not sufficient to meet the criterion.
The intent of this success criterion is to provide enough contrast between text and its background, so that it can be read by people with moderately low vision or impaired contrast perception, without the use of contrast-enhancing assistive technology.
For all consumers of visual content, adequate light-dark contrast is needed between the relative luminance of text and its background for good readability.
Many different visual impairments can substantially impact contrast sensitivity, requiring more light-dark contrast, regardless of color (hue).
- For people who are not able to distinguish certain shades of color (often referred to as color blindness
) hue and saturation have minimal or no effect on legibility as assessed by reading performance.
+ For people with color vision deficiency who are not able to distinguish certain shades of color, hue and saturation have minimal or no effect on legibility as assessed by reading performance.
Further, the inability to distinguish certain shades of color does not negatively affect light-dark contrast perception.
Therefore, in the recommendation, contrast is calculated in such a way that color (hue) is not a key factor.
Text that is decorative and conveys no information is excluded. For example, if random words are used to create a background and the words could be rearranged or substituted without changing meaning, then it would be decorative and would not need to meet this - criterion. + criterion.
- +Text that is larger and has wider character strokes is easier to read at lower contrast. The contrast requirement for larger text is therefore lower. This allows authors to use a wider range of color choices for large text, which is helpful for design of pages, particularly titles. 18 point text or 14 point bold text is judged to be large enough to require a lower contrast ratio. (See The American Printing House for the Blind Guidelines for Large Printing and The Library of Congress Guidelines for Large - Print under + Print under Resources). "18 point" and "bold" can both have different meanings in different fonts but, except for very thin or unusual fonts, they should be sufficient. Since there are so many different fonts, the general measures are used and a note regarding thin or unusual fonts is included in the definition for large-scale text.
- +When evaluating this Success Criterion, the font size in points should be obtained
from the user agent or calculated on font metrics in the way that user agents do.
- Point sizes are based on the CSS pt size as defined in
+ Point sizes are based on the CSS pt size as defined in
CSS3 Values. The ratio between
sizes in points and CSS pixels is 1pt = 1.333px, therefore 14pt
and 18pt are equivalent to approximately 18.5px and 24px.
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@
72ppi image, an author would need
to use approximately 19pt and 24pt font sizes in order to successfully present images
- of large-scale text to a user.
+ of large-scale text to a user.
The 3:1 and 4.5:1 contrast ratios referenced in this success criterion are intended to be treated as threshold values. When comparing the computed contrast ratio to the Success Criterion ratio, the computed values should not be rounded (e.g., 4.499:1 would not meet the 4.5:1 threshold).
Because authors do not have control over user settings for font smoothing/anti-aliasing, when evaluating this Success Criterion, refer to the foreground and background colors obtained from the user agent, or the underlying @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be @@ -96,52 +96,47 @@
In this provision there is an exception that reads "that are part of a picture that contains significant other visual content,". This exception is intended to separate pictures that have text in them from images of text that are done to replace text - in order to get a particular look. + in order to get a particular look.
- +Images of text do not scale as well as text because they tend to pixelate. It is also harder to change foreground and background contrast and color combinations for images of text, which is necessary for some users. Therefore, we suggest using text wherever possible, and when not, consider supplying an image of higher resolution. -
-This success criterion applies to text in the page, including placeholder text and text that is shown when a pointer is hovering over an object or when an object has keyboard focus. If any of these are used in a page, the text needs to provide sufficient contrast.
- +Although this success criterion only applies to text, similar issues occur for content presented in charts, graphs, diagrams, and other non-text-based information, which is covered by - Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast. + Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast.
- -See also + +
See also 1.4.6: Contrast (Enhanced).
- +A contrast ratio of 3:1 is the minimum level recommended by [[ISO-9241-3]] and [[ANSI-HFES-100-1988]] for standard text and vision. The 4.5:1 ratio is used in this success criterion to account for the loss in contrast that results from moderately low visual acuity, congenital or acquired color deficiencies, or the loss of contrast sensitivity that typically accompanies aging.
- +The rationale is based on a) adoption of the 3:1 contrast ratio for minimum acceptable contrast for normal observers, in the ANSI standard, and b) the empirical finding that in the population, visual acuity of 20/40 is associated with a contrast sensitivity @@ -163,29 +158,24 @@
Some people with cognitive disabilities require color combinations or hues that have low contrast, and therefore we allow and encourage authors to provide mechanisms to adjust the foreground and background colors of the content. Some of the combinations that could be chosen may have contrast levels that will be lower than those those specified here. This is not a violation of this Success Criterion, provided there is a mechanism that will return to the required values set out here. -
- +The contrast ratio of 4.5:1 was chosen for level AA because it compensated for the loss in contrast sensitivity usually experienced by users with vision loss equivalent to approximately 20/40 vision. (20/40 calculates to approximately 4.5:1.) 20/40 is - commonly reported as typical visual acuity of elders at roughly age 80. [[GITTINGS-FOZARD]] + commonly reported as typical visual acuity of elders at roughly age 80. [[GITTINGS-FOZARD]]
-The contrast ratio of 7:1 was chosen for level AAA because it compensated for the loss in contrast sensitivity usually experienced by users with vision loss equivalent to approximately 20/80 vision. People with more than this degree of vision loss usually @@ -195,46 +185,35 @@
Calculations in [[ISO-9241-3]] and [[ANSI-HFES-100-1988]] are for body text. A relaxed contrast ratio is provided for text that is much larger.
Conversion from nonlinear to linear RGB values is based on IEC/4WD 61966-2-1 [[IEC-4WD]].
-The formula (L1/L2) for contrast is based on [[ISO-9241-3]] and [[ANSI-HFES-100-1988]] standards.
The ANSI/HFS 100-1988 standard calls for the contribution from ambient light to be
included in the calculation of L1 and L2. The .05 value used is based on Typical Viewing
Flare from [[IEC-4WD]].
This success criterion and its definitions use the terms "contrast ratio" and "relative luminance" rather than "luminance" to reflect the fact that web content does not emit light itself. The contrast ratio gives a measure of the relative luminance that would result when displayed. (Because it is a ratio, it is dimensionless.)
-- Refer to + Refer to related resources for a list of tools that utilize the contrast ratio to analyze the contrast of web content.
-See also +
See also 2.4.7: Focus Visible for techniques for indicating keyboard focus.