Skip to content

Slight rework of PR #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 1, 2025

Conversation

alukach
Copy link

@alukach alukach commented Aug 1, 2025

Alright, this experience has me questioning if I know how to use Git. I'm not sure what the simplest way is to make changes to your PR from a fork. So, here we are.

developmentseed#71 looks great, thank you so much for adding it!

Profiles

I think using profiles was a very clever and reasonable way to demonstrate support for multiple STAC API backends. However, it's a bit cumbersome when someone wants to quickly just "go", so I think it makes sense to have a default. Seeing as pgSTAC is the current default today, I've moved it to the '' profile, making it operate by default1.

Additionally, we can simplify configuration by having both STAC API backends use the same hostname (i.e. stac).

As a final adjustment with regards to profiles, I figure we can just do away with the concept for common services (i.e. oidc and proxy).

Envs

I tried to drop some of the minutia configuration from the STAC services, as the defaults are likely sufficient.

Docs

Did a bit of a cleanup on the docs, imposing more hierarchy to the text.

Footnotes

  1. https://stackoverflow.com/a/77129516

environment:
STAC_FASTAPI_TITLEL: stac-fastapi-opensearch
STAC_FASTAPI_TITLE: stac-fastapi-opensearch
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming that this was a typo?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup 😵

Copy link
Collaborator

@jamesfisher-geo jamesfisher-geo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great changes! I guess I will merge this into the AM fork, then it can be merged back into Devseed

@jamesfisher-geo jamesfisher-geo merged commit af20c89 into AtomicMaps:main Aug 1, 2025
@alukach alukach deleted the AtomicMaps/main branch August 1, 2025 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants