Skip to content

Conversation

BogdanUngureanu
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #DOTCOM-14233

Proposed changes:

  • Update the WordPress importer link to point to the Calypso Stepper (only for Simple Sites)

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Apply this PR on your sandbox
  • Go to /wp-admin/import.php on a Simple Site
  • Notice that the "WordPress" importer now points to the stepper
  • Click on it and you should be redirected to the Calypso Stepper page

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WoA dev site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin (WordPress.com Site Helper), and enable the update/wp-importer-link-simple-sites branch.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin update/wp-importer-link-simple-sites

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Make sure to test your changes on all platforms that it applies to. You're responsible for the quality of the code you ship.
  3. You can use GitHub's Reviewers functionality to request a review.
  4. When it's reviewed and merged, you will be pinged in Slack to deploy the changes to WordPress.com simple once the build is done.

If you have questions about anything, reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We need more details from you. This label will be auto-added until the PR meets all requirements. label Aug 27, 2025
@BogdanUngureanu BogdanUngureanu requested a review from a team August 27, 2025 15:23
@BogdanUngureanu BogdanUngureanu self-assigned this Aug 27, 2025
@BogdanUngureanu BogdanUngureanu added [Type] Task [Status] Needs Team Review Obsolete. Use Needs Review instead. and removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We need more details from you. This label will be auto-added until the PR meets all requirements. labels Aug 27, 2025
Copy link

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 1 file.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/src/features/wpcom-imports/wpcom-imports.php 0/38 (0.00%) 0.00% 5 💔

Full summary · PHP report

If appropriate, add one of these labels to override the failing coverage check: Covered by non-unit tests Use to ignore the Code coverage requirement check when E2Es or other non-unit tests cover the code Coverage tests to be added later Use to ignore the Code coverage requirement check when tests will be added in a follow-up PR I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage.

Copy link
Member

@mmtr mmtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works as advertised.

only for Simple Sites

What about Atomic sites?

@BogdanUngureanu
Copy link
Contributor Author

BogdanUngureanu commented Aug 28, 2025

What about Atomic sites?

@mmtr on Atomic sites users are able to install the Core WP importer plugin. :)

@mmtr
Copy link
Member

mmtr commented Aug 28, 2025

@BogdanUngureanu but should they? or rephrasing the question, is the Stepper flow better than the importer plugin?

@BogdanUngureanu
Copy link
Contributor Author

BogdanUngureanu commented Aug 28, 2025

@BogdanUngureanu but should they? or rephrasing the question, is the Stepper flow better than the importer plugin?

The Stepper importer can import the content async. However, I thought to keep the behavior as close as possible to Core on Atomic. On Simple the only option is to use the Stepper.

@Copons any thoughts? :)

@BogdanUngureanu BogdanUngureanu merged commit f40c3b2 into trunk Aug 29, 2025
68 of 69 checks passed
@BogdanUngureanu BogdanUngureanu deleted the update/wp-importer-link-simple-sites branch August 29, 2025 14:24
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Team Review Obsolete. Use Needs Review instead. label Aug 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants