Skip to content

Conversation

CrazyDubya
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copilot AI and others added 3 commits July 23, 2025 15:35
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 28, 2025 02:56
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR completes the implementation by fixing remaining test failures and enhancing type inference capabilities. It addresses failing test cases by updating method calls to use the new type_analyzer component structure and improves type inference with better performance characteristics.

  • Updates test assertions to use the new analyzer.type_analyzer interface structure
  • Changes dictionary mappings from std::map to std::unordered_map for better performance
  • Enhances type inference with expression caching, comprehension support, and improved return type analysis

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tests/test_code_analyzer.py Updates test method calls and expected dictionary type mappings
tests/test_analyzer.py Updates test assertions to use new type_analyzer interface
src/converter/code_generator.py Adds unordered_map includes, math function handling, and comprehension translation
src/analyzer/type_inference.py Enhances type inference with caching, better annotation handling, and comprehension support
src/analyzer/performance_analyzer.py Improves nested loop detection sensitivity and adds descriptive messages

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.


if condition_str:
comprehension_code = f"""[&]() {{
std::vector<auto> result;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of std::vector<auto> is invalid C++ syntax. The auto keyword cannot be used as a template parameter. Consider using a concrete type or std::vector<decltype(element_expr)> pattern instead.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.


if condition_str:
comprehension_code = f"""[&]() {{
std::unordered_map<auto, auto> result;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of std::unordered_map<auto, auto> is invalid C++ syntax. The auto keyword cannot be used as template parameters. Consider using concrete types or a different approach to handle template parameter deduction.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Comment on lines +148 to +151
# Check bool first since bool is a subclass of int in Python
if isinstance(expr.value, bool):
result = 'bool'
elif isinstance(expr.value, int):
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Good practice to check bool before int since bool is a subclass of int in Python. This ensures correct type inference for boolean literals.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

# Check for nested loops
nested_loops = self._count_nested_loops(node)
if nested_loops > 2:
if nested_loops >= 2: # Detect 2+ level nesting (changed from > 2)
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The change from > 2 to >= 2 will now flag double-nested loops as performance issues. This is more aggressive but may produce false positives for legitimate double-nested loops that are necessary and performant.

Suggested change
if nested_loops >= 2: # Detect 2+ level nesting (changed from > 2)
if nested_loops > 2: # Detect 3+ level nesting

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants