-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Complete all PR implementations: Fix remaining test failures and enhance type inference #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…g, performance optimizations Co-authored-by: CrazyDubya <[email protected]>
…nce type inference Co-authored-by: CrazyDubya <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR completes the implementation by fixing remaining test failures and enhancing type inference capabilities. It addresses failing test cases by updating method calls to use the new type_analyzer component structure and improves type inference with better performance characteristics.
- Updates test assertions to use the new
analyzer.type_analyzer
interface structure - Changes dictionary mappings from
std::map
tostd::unordered_map
for better performance - Enhances type inference with expression caching, comprehension support, and improved return type analysis
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
tests/test_code_analyzer.py | Updates test method calls and expected dictionary type mappings |
tests/test_analyzer.py | Updates test assertions to use new type_analyzer interface |
src/converter/code_generator.py | Adds unordered_map includes, math function handling, and comprehension translation |
src/analyzer/type_inference.py | Enhances type inference with caching, better annotation handling, and comprehension support |
src/analyzer/performance_analyzer.py | Improves nested loop detection sensitivity and adds descriptive messages |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
|
||
if condition_str: | ||
comprehension_code = f"""[&]() {{ | ||
std::vector<auto> result; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The use of std::vector<auto>
is invalid C++ syntax. The auto
keyword cannot be used as a template parameter. Consider using a concrete type or std::vector<decltype(element_expr)>
pattern instead.
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
|
||
if condition_str: | ||
comprehension_code = f"""[&]() {{ | ||
std::unordered_map<auto, auto> result; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The use of std::unordered_map<auto, auto>
is invalid C++ syntax. The auto
keyword cannot be used as template parameters. Consider using concrete types or a different approach to handle template parameter deduction.
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
# Check bool first since bool is a subclass of int in Python | ||
if isinstance(expr.value, bool): | ||
result = 'bool' | ||
elif isinstance(expr.value, int): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nitpick] Good practice to check bool before int since bool is a subclass of int in Python. This ensures correct type inference for boolean literals.
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
# Check for nested loops | ||
nested_loops = self._count_nested_loops(node) | ||
if nested_loops > 2: | ||
if nested_loops >= 2: # Detect 2+ level nesting (changed from > 2) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nitpick] The change from > 2
to >= 2
will now flag double-nested loops as performance issues. This is more aggressive but may produce false positives for legitimate double-nested loops that are necessary and performant.
if nested_loops >= 2: # Detect 2+ level nesting (changed from > 2) | |
if nested_loops > 2: # Detect 3+ level nesting |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
No description provided.