-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
scripts: format_nix: allow newer versions of uncrustify #3086
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
twilfredo
wants to merge
1
commit into
DMTF:main
Choose a base branch
from
twilfredo:wilfred/bump-uncrustify
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+2
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The CI pipeline runs within an Ubuntu container. However, even when developers use a newer version of uncrustify (e.g., 0.80) locally, the CI continues to run with version 0.78. This version mismatch can lead to confusion, especially when formatting differences cause CI failures. Hence, I feel it is better to have the stricter version check for making it easy to figure out what is needed for CI to pass.
Originally, the strict version check was introduced because we had encountered issues in the past where newer versions of uncrustify deprecated certain configuration keys or altered the behavior of existing ones. These changes led to unintended formatting modifications and numerous unnecessary code diffs. Additionally, Ubuntu tends to lag behind Fedora in adopting the latest uncrustify releases, further contributing to inconsistencies across development and CI environments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @manojkiraneda. At this point the style checker is mainly for CI/CD. In particular if you run it locally it will change a lot of files. Maybe the file should be moved to https://github.com/DMTF/libspdm/tree/main/.github to show that it should not be run locally.