Reduce integrations overhead

[bwoebi]

• Using static for integrations (avoiding carrying an Integration instance around).
• static Closures
• Simplify sandboxed calls, reduce them to minimum overhead
• Only allocate new runtime cache objects when actually needed

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.74%. Comparing base (e4f6598) to head (a78c4ee).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3380      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.87%   61.74%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       12481    12481              
  Branches     1630     1630              
==========================================
- Hits         7722     7706      -16     
- Misses       4038     4054      +16     
  Partials      721      721              

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e4f6598...a78c4ee. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-09-18 17:45:37

Comparing candidate commit a78c4ee in PR branch bob/static-integrations with baseline commit e4f6598 in branch master.

Found 11 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 181 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:ComposerTelemetryBench/benchTelemetryParsing-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-1.880µs; -0.920µs] or [-13.526%; -6.618%]

scenario:ContextPropagationBench/benchExtractHeaders64Bit

• 🟩 execution_time [-93.400ns; -30.600ns] or [-7.575%; -2.482%]

scenario:HookBench/benchHookOverheadInstallHookOnFunction

• 🟩 execution_time [-116.111µs; -102.024µs] or [-19.750%; -17.354%]

scenario:HookBench/benchHookOverheadInstallHookOnFunction-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-89.726µs; -73.826µs] or [-16.268%; -13.385%]

scenario:HookBench/benchHookOverheadInstallHookOnMethod

• 🟩 execution_time [-98.362µs; -83.384µs] or [-16.495%; -13.984%]

scenario:HookBench/benchHookOverheadInstallHookOnMethod-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-89.046µs; -67.458µs] or [-16.035%; -12.147%]

scenario:LogsInjectionBench/benchLogsInfoInjection

• 🟩 execution_time [-680.155ns; -490.845ns] or [-9.384%; -6.772%]

scenario:LogsInjectionBench/benchLogsInfoInjection-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-709.753ns; -340.647ns] or [-7.483%; -3.591%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization

• 🟩 execution_time [-7.943µs; -7.077µs] or [-7.259%; -6.467%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-8.603µs; -7.517µs] or [-7.724%; -6.749%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead

• 🟥 mem_peak [+209.344KB; +209.344KB] or [+4.616%; +4.616%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead-opcache

• 🟥 mem_peak [+207.536KB; +207.536KB] or [+9.464%; +9.464%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

• 🟩 execution_time [-64.122µs; -53.578µs] or [-13.582%; -11.349%]

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks [ profiler ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-09-18 16:54:28

Comparing candidate commit a78c4ee in PR branch bob/static-integrations with baseline commit e4f6598 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 28 metrics, 8 unstable metrics.