Skip to content

Conversation

realFlowControl
Copy link
Member

Description

Reviewer checklist

  • Test coverage seems ok.
  • Appropriate labels assigned.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.02%. Comparing base (3456dec) to head (44a0300).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.15%   62.02%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       12622    12622              
  Branches     1650     1650              
==========================================
- Hits         7845     7829      -16     
- Misses       4050     4066      +16     
  Partials      727      727              

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3456dec...44a0300. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 18, 2025

Benchmarks [ profiler ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-10-18 12:05:07

Comparing candidate commit 44a0300 in PR branch florian/timerfd with baseline commit 3456dec in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

scenario:walk_stack/1

  • 🟩 wall_time [-367.891ns; -361.988ns] or [-2.888%; -2.841%]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants