feat(cli): allow rewriting the query using an LLM. #124
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Davidyz
force-pushed
the
cli/query-rewriter
branch
from
367aa01 to
8266efe
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #124 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.26% 99.29% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 22 25 +3
Lines 1506 1566 +60
==========================================
+ Hits 1495 1555 +60
Misses 11 11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Davidyz
force-pushed
the
cli/query-rewriter
branch
7 times, most recently
from
50b0d34 to
78a6127
Compare
Davidyz
force-pushed
the
cli/query-rewriter
branch
from
78a6127 to
b489845
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The code is mostly completed, but I think it's better if #67 can be addressed so that we can actually see how much improvement this feature brings.