Allow isc_tpb_read_consistency to imply read committed #8746
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t more robust to improper set of flags
hvlad
reviewed
Sep 21, 2025
…fied without isc_tpb_read_committed
hvlad
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We allow to specify
isc_tpb_read_consistencyalone and at least one driver currently specifies ReadCommitted ReadConsistency mode this way. However, in fact the transaction isolation becomes Snapshot withTRA_read_consistencyflag being set too. This causes asserts in the code and I'm not really sure the chase/restart logic works properly in all cases.Given that such a usage seems quite logical and handy, I suggest to not raise an error but rather imply ReadCommitted instead of Snapshot in this case.
Also, the transaction isolation detection in the trace was changed to be more resistant to weird flag combinations like the one described above and not raise unexpected asserts. It's now also in sync with the value of
MON$ISOLATION_MODE.