Skip to content

Conversation

@AndrianBdn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@AndrianBdn AndrianBdn added the publish Publish to NPM label Oct 3, 2025
@AndrianBdn AndrianBdn requested review from hi-rai and satvik007 October 3, 2025 13:38
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @AndrianBdn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where the JUnit XML parser was overly strict, requiring a 'type' attribute for failure and error elements, which is not always present in reports from certain test frameworks. By making this attribute optional, the parser can now correctly process a wider range of JUnit XML outputs, improving the robustness and compatibility of the QAS CLI tool. The changes are validated with new test data and a dedicated test case.

Highlights

  • JUnit XML Parsing: The JUnit XML parser has been updated to treat the 'type' attribute for failure and error elements as optional, enhancing compatibility with various test runners like Jest that may omit this attribute.
  • New Test Fixture and Case: A new JUnit XML fixture file and a corresponding test case have been added to validate the correct parsing of failure elements without a 'type' attribute.
  • Version Update: The package version has been incremented from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly makes the type attribute optional for <failure> elements in JUnit XML reports, which is a necessary fix for compatibility with test runners like Jest. The change in the Zod schema is appropriate and is accompanied by a new test case and fixture, ensuring the fix is working as expected. However, the PR also includes the addition of an AGENTS.md file which seems unrelated to this fix. Please see my comment on that file.

AGENTS.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
CLAUDE.md No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure of this - Is this file intentional ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it is a symlink for other agentic tools

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right

@AndrianBdn AndrianBdn merged commit f18ca1c into main Oct 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@AndrianBdn AndrianBdn deleted the fix-failure-type-202510031336 branch October 3, 2025 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

publish Publish to NPM

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants