Skip to content

Conversation

@hi-rai
Copy link
Contributor

@hi-rai hi-rai commented Jan 2, 2026

No description provided.

@hi-rai hi-rai self-assigned this Jan 2, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hi-rai, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the clarity and accuracy of the README.md file. It enhances the user experience by providing a direct link to relevant documentation for API token generation and streamlines the document by removing information that is no longer current or pertinent to the general audience.

Highlights

  • Documentation Link Added: A direct link to the QA Sphere API authentication documentation has been added for the QAS_TOKEN environment variable, making it easier for users to find help generating a token.
  • Outdated Information Removed: The 'Publishing' section, which detailed how maintainers could trigger auto-releases to NPM, has been removed as it was likely outdated or not relevant for general users.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request makes two small updates to the README.md file. The addition of a documentation link for API token generation is a good improvement. For the removal of the publishing instructions, I've left a comment with two suggestions: first, to move the publishing information to a contributor-focused document instead of deleting it, and second, to ensure the file retains a final newline character, which is removed by this change.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

README.md (229-230)

medium

I have a couple of points regarding the removal of these lines:

  1. Process Documentation: The publishing information on line 230 seems important for maintainers. Instead of deleting it, please consider moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md file or other maintainer-focused documentation to avoid losing this knowledge.
  2. File Formatting: Removing these lines also removes the final newline from the file. It's a strong convention to end files with a single newline character. Please ensure the file has a final newline after your changes.

@hi-rai hi-rai requested review from AndrianBdn and satvik007 January 2, 2026 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants