Add my GitHub username (Raghu0703) to the project

[Raghu0703]

This PR adds my GitHub username (Raghu0703) as part of the contribution process.

• Updated file: CONTRIBUTORS.md
• Added: one line with my username

Thank you for reviewing!

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added new contributor to the contributors list
  • Updated community section heading in README for consistency

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new contributor entry "Raghu0703" to CONTRIBUTORS.md and updates the README.md Community section heading by capitalizing "contributors" to "Contributors".

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Contributor Registry Update CONTRIBUTORS.md	Adds new contributor entry for "Raghu0703"
Documentation Capitalization README.md	Changes Community section heading from "contributors" to "Contributors" for consistency

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

These are straightforward, non-code changes: a simple name addition to the contributors list and a minor capitalization adjustment in documentation. No logic, no dependencies, no complexity—just pure good vibes going into the record books!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description lacks required sections from the template, including target issue, implementation details, and test/documentation checklist items.	Add target issue reference, include the required checklist items from the template (Prepare section, Test and Document section), and confirm documentation impact status.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change—adding a contributor's GitHub username to the project.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[mo-auto]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6b9f40 and 9754cb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• CONTRIBUTORS.md (1 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

README.md

[style] ~87-~87: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ... ## Community A BIG thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a divers...

(AWESOME)

---

[style] ~87-~87: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 21 exclamation marks for a text that’s 11634 characters long)
Context: ...G thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a diverse and inclusive...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

CONTRIBUTORS.md

1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading

(MD041, first-line-heading, first-line-h1)

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Capitalization change aligns with contributor recognition—consider optional style refinements.

The capitalization of "Contributors" is a great touch and reinforces recognition of your community! 👏 However, LanguageTool's linter offers two optional style suggestions for you to consider:

1. The word "amazing" could be replaced with a more formal alternative (e.g., "dedicated," "outstanding," "valued")
2. The double exclamation marks (!!) might be considered excessive for professional documentation

These are stylistic preferences rather than requirements, so feel free to keep the current wording if it reflects your project's tone and culture!

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~87-~87: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ... ## Community A BIG thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a divers...

(AWESOME)

---

[style] ~87-~87: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 21 exclamation marks for a text that’s 11634 characters long)
Context: ...G thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a diverse and inclusive...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In README.md around line 87, the sentence "A BIG thanks to all the amazing
Contributors!! 👏 👏" uses informal tone and excessive punctuation; update the
line to a more professional alternative by replacing "amazing" with a more
formal adjective such as "dedicated", "outstanding", or "valued" and reduce the
double exclamation marks to a single exclamation or period (e.g., "A BIG thanks
to all the dedicated Contributors!" or "A big thanks to all the valued
contributors.").