Skip to content

Added furlongs test #758

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stemann
Copy link

@stemann stemann commented Jul 28, 2025

Added furlongs test - with Furlongs.jl copied from test/testhelpers in julia - implementing suggestion described in #665 (comment)

@@ -113,4 +114,10 @@ end
@test ForwardDiff.derivative(x -> (1+im)*x, 0) == (1+im)
end

@testset "non-standard numbers" begin
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Likely a non-descriptive test set name - feel free to suggest a better name.

@stemann stemann force-pushed the feature/furlongs_test branch from 263b478 to 5a38c38 Compare July 28, 2025 11:23
@stemann stemann force-pushed the feature/furlongs_test branch from 5a38c38 to d75ad63 Compare July 28, 2025 11:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (d813023) to head (d75ad63).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #758   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.33%   89.33%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1013     1013           
=======================================
  Hits          905      905           
  Misses        108      108           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mcabbott
Copy link
Member

Seems fine, but is this expected to pass without #665 ?

(I would add a big comment linking to Base to explain which code is copied, and which is new tests.)

@stemann
Copy link
Author

stemann commented Jul 30, 2025

Not sure, just trying to get the ball rolling :-) @longemen3000 suggested to add this test as a separate PR.

Thoughts, @devmotion?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants