Skip to content

Conversation

@alycejenni
Copy link
Member

e.g. citation file, contributing information, and issue templates.
The file it lists doesn't even exist, so I assume this is no longer necessary.
If the exact counts aren't important, we can use a random sample to get a decent estimate of fields and their usage but significantly faster. The default leaves the behaviour as before (no sampling).
Tests field ranking over a larger number of random records.
Avoids having to constantly rebuild containers when developing and running tests repeatedly.
Useful for very quickly retrieving a basic list of all fields from the latest index. Returns field type information, but type counts are all set to 1.
@alycejenni alycejenni merged commit b90377b into main Dec 30, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants