Better exploit blocking #4771
Open
Better exploit blocking #4771
+228
−17
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… protections Co-authored-by: fuomag9 <[email protected]>
…s, spam filtering, scanner detection, and rate limiting Co-authored-by: fuomag9 <[email protected]>
…on and expand RFI protocol coverage Co-authored-by: fuomag9 <[email protected]>
…9-9223ce132442 Enhance block-exploits.conf with focused modern security protections and refined pattern accuracy
|
Docker Image for build 1 is available on DockerHub: Note Ensure you backup your NPM instance before testing this image! Especially if there are database changes. Warning Changes and additions to DNS Providers require verification by at least 2 members of the community! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should improve exploit blocking, better implementation would to be use https://coraza.io but in the short term this should be more useful. I've removed the spam section since it doesn't make sense and it's too prone to bypasses anyway (I know obfuscation also works for other vulnerabilities types)