Skip to content

Conversation

@jbaudoux
Copy link
Contributor

@jbaudoux jbaudoux commented Nov 29, 2024

Give in evaluation context what is being moved

cc @rousseldenis

Evaluating the condition on the quant does not represent what is being moved as I can move only a partial quantity. I need the quantity being moved to see if it fit the destination location.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rousseldenis,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@jbaudoux jbaudoux added this to the 16.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@jbaudoux jbaudoux changed the title [IMP] stock_storage_type: condition context [16.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: condition context Nov 29, 2024
@jbaudoux
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbaudoux commented Dec 4, 2024

Need review here @rousseldenis @sebalix

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2025

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Apr 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 11, 2025
@sebalix sebalix reopened this May 12, 2025
@sebalix sebalix added no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. and removed stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. labels May 12, 2025
Copy link

@rousseldenis rousseldenis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Give in evaluation context what is being moved
@jbaudoux jbaudoux force-pushed the 16-stock_storage_type-cond_var branch from a582d80 to cb2c00f Compare June 2, 2025 11:33
@jbaudoux
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbaudoux commented Jun 2, 2025

rebased

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants