Fix detection of Let vs LetIn after a 'struct' #324
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
An indented `let` inside a `struct ... end` was incorrectly interpreted as a `LetIn`.
NathanReb
force-pushed
the
struct-let
branch
from
c20e63c to
363a9d2
Compare
NathanReb
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2025
NathanReb
pushed a commit
to Julow/ocp-indent
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2025
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rebours <[email protected]>
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An indented
letinside astruct ... endwas incorrectly interpreted as aLetIn.Same motivation as in #323. The indentation of
funis different inside aLetand aLetIn.