- 
        Couldn't load subscription status. 
- Fork 2.3k
[WIP v2 - deprecated] Unlikelihood token loss #2011
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Draft
      
        
      
            funboarder13920
  wants to merge
  4
  commits into
  OpenNMT:master
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
funboarder13920:unlikelihood_loss_and_ppl
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: master
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Draft
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            4 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      6d93dcc
              
                implement unlikelihood token loss and fix ppl to always be the ppl
              
              
                funboarder13920 c1787a8
              
                address PR comments + commit missing test file
              
              
                funboarder13920 770f60d
              
                mutually exclusive label_smoothing and unlikelihood_coeff
              
              
                funboarder13920 118a43f
              
                merge LossComputeBase and CommonLossComputeBase
              
              
                funboarder13920 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              | Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | 
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||
| import unittest | ||
| from onmt.utils.loss import UnlikelihoodTokenLoss | ||
| import torch | ||
| import math | ||
|  | ||
|  | ||
| class TestUnlikelihoodLossCriterion(unittest.TestCase): | ||
| def test_compute_previous_context_tokens(self): | ||
| criterion = UnlikelihoodTokenLoss(1, 7) | ||
| target = torch.tensor([[2, 3, 4, 3, 5], [1, 1, 5, 6, 7]]).permute(1, 0) | ||
| previous_context_tokens = criterion.compute_previous_context_tokens( | ||
| target | ||
| ) | ||
|  | ||
| self.assertEqual( | ||
| previous_context_tokens.permute(1, 0, 2).tolist(), | ||
| torch.tensor( | ||
| [ | ||
| [ | ||
| [7, 7, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [2, 7, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [2, 3, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [2, 7, 4, 7, 7], | ||
| [2, 3, 4, 3, 7], | ||
| ], | ||
| [ | ||
| [7, 7, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [7, 7, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [1, 1, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| [1, 1, 5, 7, 7], | ||
| [7, 7, 7, 7, 7], | ||
| ], | ||
| ] | ||
| ).tolist(), | ||
| ) | ||
|  | ||
| def test_loss_perfect_pred_should_be_zero(self): | ||
| criterion = UnlikelihoodTokenLoss(1, 7) | ||
| n_prob = -10e6 | ||
| target = torch.tensor([[2, 3, 4, 3, 5], [1, 1, 5, 6, 7]]).permute(1, 0) | ||
| perfect_probs = [ | ||
| [[n_prob if i != t else 1 for i in range(8)] for t in ex_target] | ||
| for ex_target in target | ||
| ] | ||
|  | ||
| # check padded seq is removed | ||
| perfect_probs[-1][-1][-1] = n_prob | ||
| perfect_probs[-1][-1][1] = 0.1 | ||
|  | ||
| output = torch.tensor(perfect_probs).view(-1, 8) | ||
|  | ||
| unlikelihood_loss = criterion.compute_unlikelihood_loss(output, target) | ||
|  | ||
| self.assertEqual(unlikelihood_loss.sum().item(), 0) | ||
|  | ||
| def test_loss_value(self): | ||
| criterion = UnlikelihoodTokenLoss(1, 7) | ||
| n_prob = -10e6 | ||
| target = torch.tensor([[2, 3, 4, 3, 5], [1, 1, 5, 6, 7]]).permute(1, 0) | ||
| perfect_probs = [ | ||
| [[n_prob if i != t else 1 for i in range(8)] for t in ex_target] | ||
| for ex_target in target | ||
| ] | ||
|  | ||
| # check padded seq is removed | ||
| perfect_probs[-1][-1][-1] = n_prob | ||
| perfect_probs[-1][-1][1] = 0.1 | ||
|  | ||
| # set prob at 0.5 on 1 after softmax | ||
| perfect_probs[2][-1][1] = 1 | ||
|  | ||
| output = torch.tensor(perfect_probs).view(-1, 8) | ||
|  | ||
| unlikelihood_loss = criterion.compute_unlikelihood_loss(output, target) | ||
|  | ||
| self.assertAlmostEqual( | ||
| unlikelihood_loss.view(5, 2, 8)[2, -1, 1].item(), -math.log(0.5) | ||
| ) | 
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure to grasp the whole rationale behind the
CommonLossCompute/LossComputeBaserefactoring. Is the last big remaining difference only the log_ppl computation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Underlying question is: do we really need both
CommonLossComputeandLossComputeBaseanymore?)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The _compute_loss, _make_shard_state and the way to use the generator are different between CopyGeneratorLoss and the other classes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do it in one class, the code is already not very clear, it's not going to be worse. If we do that CopyGenerator will override _compute_loss, _compute_log_ppl and _compute_alignement_loss will only be used in the compute_loss of the main class
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I think this might be a bit better to explicitly override this method instead of having a full class that we don't really know what it's for unless we look at this specific CopyGeneratorLoss.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I merged it, the ppl part is not nice. Also there is a normalization args that was not used anywhere, I will investigate to see if the normalization process disappeared by mistake
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
normalization was already not used a year ago
OpenNMT-py/onmt/utils/loss.py
Line 228 in 7835130