-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Inj/displacement solver #372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Merge main into displacement solver
…tej/JustRelax.jl into inj/displacement-solver
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
I will not go forward with this PR. The only purpose of this PR was to check differences between this dev branch and the main branch. @albert-de-montserrat everything looks fine |
|
@inavarretej before closing this, there's a few changes in #357 that will potentially have an impact on your dev branch |
|
@aelligp cool! I'll take a look at them |
|
@inavarretej now you should be able to pull from main |
|
@inavarretej what is l_tau? |
|
Where did you find it? @aelligp |
| rheology::NTuple{N, MaterialParams}, | ||
| phase_ratio, | ||
| r, | ||
| lτ, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
here, also in PT and compute_U but you dont use it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see, I was trying to find a characteristic length to use in the displacement solver, but then I realized I dont need it. I will delete it from the code.
Draft of PR. Looking for potential differences between both implementations.