Pennylane Jax patcher test: bump jax to 0.7.0

[JerryChen97]

Context:
Basically, for Catalyst, the new bump-jax-patching branch means there's no patching happenning by default anymore.
In this way, we can better separate the impact of patching, instead of causing inheritance of patching from upstream to downstream.
We could also better observe what patches are actually needed for other packages depending on Pennylane.

Description of the Change:

Benefits:

Possible Drawbacks:

Related GitHub Issues:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.51%. Comparing base (b25d701) to head (01125d4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on rniczh/bump-jax-to-0.7.0.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                    @@
##           rniczh/bump-jax-to-0.7.0    #2205   +/-   ##
=========================================================
  Coverage                     97.51%   97.51%           
=========================================================
  Files                            93       93           
  Lines                         10996    10996           
  Branches                       1049     1049           
=========================================================
  Hits                          10723    10723           
  Misses                          210      210           
  Partials                         63       63           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
Please edit doc/releases/changelog-dev.md on your branch with:

• A one-to-two sentence description of the change. You may include a small working example for new features.
• A link back to this PR.
• Your name (or GitHub username) in the contributors section.

[rniczh]

LGTM 💯

[JerryChen97]

By fa35f3b, I would like to see the compatibility of this new adjustment with the PL with globaly patched jax

[JerryChen97]

If this round of tests pass, it proves that we can safely merge this branch into base, regardless of how Pennylane proceeds with updating the patching strategy @rniczh @paul0403