[Components] finerworks #10976 #18830
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 2 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughAdds three new FinerWorks action modules (Get Prices, Get Product Details, Validate Address), expands the FinerWorks app with detailed propDefinitions, an async product SKU options resolver, HTTP helpers and API methods (validateAddress, getPrices, getProductDetails, getProducts), and updates package version and dependencies. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Action as Action Module
participant App as finerworks.app
participant HTTP as FinerWorks API
Note over Action,App: Action invoked with props
Action->>App: this.app.<method>(payload) %% getPrices / getProductDetails / validateAddress
App->>App: _baseUrl() → construct URL
App->>App: _makeRequest(opts) with auth headers
App->>HTTP: POST /{endpoint} (payload)
HTTP-->>App: response
App-->>Action: return response
Action->>Action: $.export("$summary", ...) based on response
Action-->>User: return response
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
39-39: Consider a more descriptive summary message.The current message "Successfully sent the request" is generic. Consider making it more specific to improve user experience, e.g., "Successfully retrieved price for the specified product" or "Successfully fetched pricing information."
Apply this diff to improve the summary:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request"); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved price for the specified product");components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
131-138: Consider whether the empty data object is necessary.The
getProductsmethod passesdata: {}to the API. If the FinerWorks API doesn't require a data payload for this endpoint, this could be simplified by removing it.If the API doesn't require a data payload, apply this diff:
async getProducts(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/list_virtual_inventory", method: "post", - data: {}, ...args, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/package.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
response(78-78)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (3)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/finerworks/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump and dependency addition are appropriate.The version bump to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features (actions), and the platform dependency is necessary for the axios import used in the app file.
Also applies to: 15-17
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (2)
3-13: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata follows Pipedream conventions with appropriate annotations for a read-only operation.
29-40: Verify data structure consistency with the Finerworks API documentation.The codebase shows that
get-pricespassesdata: [...](direct array) whileget-product-detailspassesdata: { products: [...] }(nested under products property). Both methods delegate directly to_makeRequest, which sends the data untransformed to the respective API endpoints (/get_pricesand/get_product_details).The different structures appear intentional since they target different endpoints, but no inline documentation, tests, or validation rules in the codebase confirm this aligns with the official Finerworks API specifications. Please verify both payloads match the current API requirements to ensure correctness.
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
3-13: LGTM! Action metadata is properly configured.The metadata and annotations are appropriate for this read-only pricing query action.
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
3-82: LGTM! Comprehensive address validation props.The action metadata and props are well-structured, with proper reuse of propDefinitions from the app. The address fields cover all necessary components for validation.
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM! Comprehensive propDefinitions with dynamic options.The propDefinitions are well-structured with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and optional flags. The productSku prop includes a dynamic options resolver that fetches available products, providing a good user experience.
Also applies to: 6-88
90-109: LGTM! Clean HTTP request infrastructure.The base URL and request helper methods are well-implemented, with proper authentication header injection and flexible options spreading.
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guard against undefined response.status.success.
The summary message directly concatenates response.status.success, which could fail or produce "Validation success: undefined" if the response structure differs from expectations or the API returns an error.
Consider using optional chaining and a fallback:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs around
line 102, the summary concatenates response.status.success directly which can be
undefined and produce misleading text or throw; update the expression to use
optional chaining and a safe fallback (e.g., response?.status?.success ?? false
or convert to a string like String(response?.status?.success ?? 'unknown')) so
the summary always displays a deterministic value and won’t throw when response
or status is missing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same for this summary (also worth checking CodeRabbit's comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the summary messages in the other action files
cat components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs | grep -A 2 -B 2 '\$\.export.*\$summary'
echo "---"
cat components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs | grep -A 2 -B 2 '\$\.export.*\$summary'
Length of output: 247
@GTFalcao, I checked all the summary messages in this PR. The good news is that get-prices.mjs and get-product-details.mjs are already using safe static strings for their summaries, so they don't have the same issue.
Only validate-address.mjs has the unsafe property access problem that CodeRabbit flagged. You should apply the fix here using optional chaining and a template literal:
$.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`);Alternatively, if you want to make it more robust and user-friendly, you could use:
$.export("$summary", `Address validation ${response.status?.success ? 'succeeded' : 'failed'}`);This would give a clearer message about whether the validation actually passed or not.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
GTFalcao
left a comment
GTFalcao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I made some non-blocking comments that should be checked out, but moving this to QA
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same for this summary (also worth checking CodeRabbit's comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
6-6: Update description to match plural form.The action name is "Get Prices" (plural) and the implementation handles multiple prices, but the description says "Get the price of a product" (singular). Consider updating the description to reflect that it can return multiple prices.
- description: "Get the price of a product. [See the documentation](https://v2.api.finerworks.com/Help/Api/POST-v3-get_prices)", + description: "Get prices for a product. [See the documentation](https://v2.api.finerworks.com/Help/Api/POST-v3-get_prices)",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-15T22:01:11.472Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 18362
File: components/leonardo_ai/actions/generate-image/generate-image.mjs:103-105
Timestamp: 2025-09-15T22:01:11.472Z
Learning: In Pipedream components, pipedream/platform's axios implementation automatically excludes undefined values from HTTP requests, so there's no need to manually check for truthiness before including properties in request payloads.
Applied to files:
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs
📚 Learning: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 16954
File: components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs:14-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learning: In the Salesloft API integration (components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs), the _makeRequest method returns response.data which directly contains arrays for list endpoints like listPeople, listCadences, listUsers, and listAccounts. The propDefinitions correctly call .map() directly on these responses without needing to destructure a nested data property.
Applied to files:
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (3)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (3)
90-92: LGTM!The
_baseUrl()method correctly provides the base API URL. This is a clean pattern for centralizing the endpoint configuration.
119-147: LGTM! Clean and consistent API method pattern.All four API methods (
validateAddress,getPrices,getProductDetails,getProducts) follow a consistent pattern by delegating to_makeRequestwith appropriate path and method configuration. The spread operator allows callers to pass additional options likedataand$for request context.Note:
getProductsincludesdata: {}which can be overridden by spreading...argsafterward if needed.
77-86: Critical issue: Response structure handling appears incorrect. Verify API integration and add error handling.The code assumes
getProducts()returns a response with aproductsproperty, but axios returns responses with the data wrapped in a.dataproperty. The code at line 79 accessesresponse.productsdirectly, which would beundefinedwith a standard axios response—it should likely beresponse.data.products.Additionally, there's no error handling if the API call fails, and no validation that the response structure matches expectations (that
productsexists, is an array, and items haveskuandnameproperties).No tests or mocks were found in the repository to confirm the actual API response structure. Manually verify that:
- The API endpoint
/list_virtual_inventoryreturns a response object with the expected structure- Whether an axios response interceptor is configured to unwrap the data automatically
- Add error handling to gracefully handle API failures or unexpected responses
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.prices.length} ${response.prices.length > 1 | ||
| ? "prices" | ||
| : "price"} for product SKU ${this.productSku}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
🧩 Analysis chain
Simplify summary and verify response structure.
The inline ternary for pluralization reduces readability. Consider simplifying or extracting to a helper. Additionally, verify that the API response structure includes response.prices as an array, since this code assumes that structure without validation.
Apply this diff to simplify:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.prices.length} ${response.prices.length > 1
- ? "prices"
- : "price"} for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);
+ const count = response.prices?.length || 0;
+ const pluralized = count === 1 ? "price" : "prices";
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${count} ${pluralized} for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);Run the following script to verify the response structure from the API:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that getPrices returns an object with a 'prices' array property
rg -n "prices" components/finerworks/ --type js -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 0
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Find and examine the get-prices.mjs file
find . -name "get-prices.mjs" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -5
Length of output: 57
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# List contents of finerworks actions directory to understand structure
fd --type f . components/finerworks/actions/ 2>/dev/null | head -20Length of output: 197
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API response handling in finerworks component
rg -n "response\." components/finerworks/ --type js -C 2 2>/dev/null | head -50Length of output: 0
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Read the full get-prices.mjs file to understand the response structure
cat ./components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs
Length of output: 1046
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Read the finerworks.app.mjs to understand getPrices return structure
cat ./components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs
Length of output: 3543
Simplify summary and add defensive response handling.
The inline ternary for pluralization reduces readability. Additionally, the code directly accesses response.prices.length without validating the response structure, which could fail if the API returns an unexpected format.
Consider extracting the pluralization logic and using optional chaining for defensive programming:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.prices.length} ${response.prices.length > 1
- ? "prices"
- : "price"} for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);
+ const count = response.prices?.length || 0;
+ const pluralized = count === 1 ? "price" : "prices";
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${count} ${pluralized} for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs around lines 41 to
43, simplify the summary by extracting pluralization into a small variable and
make response access defensive: compute count = response?.prices?.length ?? 0,
build label = count === 1 ? "price" : "prices", then use those in the summary
string so it no longer inlines the ternary and will not throw if response or
prices is missing.
| console.log({ | ||
| ...otherOpts, | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`, | ||
| "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`, | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debug console.log statement that logs sensitive credentials.
This console.log outputs the entire request configuration including authentication headers (web_api_key and app_key). Logging credentials in production code creates a security risk, as these logs may be exposed in log aggregation systems, CI/CD pipelines, or monitoring tools.
Apply this diff to remove the debug statement:
- console.log({
- ...otherOpts,
- url: this._baseUrl() + path,
- headers: {
- "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`,
- "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`,
- ...headers,
- },
- });
return axios($, {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.log({ | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`, | |
| "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`, | |
| ...headers, | |
| }, | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs around lines 100 to 108, there is a
debug console.log that prints the full request config including sensitive
headers (web_api_key and app_key); remove this console.log entirely (or replace
it with a non-sensitive debug log that omits headers and credential values) so
credentials are never written to logs, and if debugging is needed, log only safe
fields (e.g., method, url, and sanitized headers) behind a guarded debug flag.
| "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`, | ||
| "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
Remove unnecessary template literals.
The authentication keys are already strings and don't need template literal wrapping. This simplifies the code without changing behavior.
Apply this diff:
headers: {
- "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`,
- "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`,
+ "web_api_key": this.$auth.web_api_key,
+ "app_key": this.$auth.app_key,
...headers,
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "web_api_key": `${this.$auth.web_api_key}`, | |
| "app_key": `${this.$auth.app_key}`, | |
| headers: { | |
| "web_api_key": this.$auth.web_api_key, | |
| "app_key": this.$auth.app_key, | |
| ...headers, | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs around lines 113 to 114, the code
wraps this.$auth.web_api_key and this.$auth.app_key in unnecessary template
literals; replace the template literals with direct property references (use
this.$auth.web_api_key and this.$auth.app_key as plain values) so the keys
remain strings but without the redundant interpolation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
102-102: Fix typo and guard against undefined response properties.The summary message has multiple issues that were previously flagged:
- Typo: "Successfully valid" should be "Successfully validated"
- Unsafe property access:
response.status.successcould be undefined- Awkward message format
Apply this diff to fix both issues:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully valid the address: " + response.status.success); + $.export("$summary", `Address validation ${response.status?.success ? 'succeeded' : 'failed'}`);Based on learnings
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Applied to files:
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (3)
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
response(78-78)
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (3)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
response(78-78)
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrived details for product SKU ${this.productSku}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in summary message.
The word "retrived" should be "retrieved".
Apply this diff:
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrived details for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved details for product SKU ${this.productSku}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrived details for product SKU ${this.productSku}`); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved details for product SKU ${this.productSku}`); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs
around line 41, the summary string contains a typo ("retrived"). Update the
exported summary to use the correct spelling "retrieved" so the line reads that
the details were "successfully retrieved" for the product SKU; keep the
interpolation of this.productSku unchanged.
|
Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release! Test reports
|
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit