Experimental PowerShell discover extension #1071
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
With PR #1025 around, it might be worthwhile to rename the directories. |
Gijsreyn
force-pushed
the
implement-powershell-discover
branch
2 times, most recently
from
623d593 to
5b7502f
Compare
Gijsreyn
force-pushed
the
implement-powershell-discover
branch
from
5b7502f to
991f7ce
Compare
…jsreyn/operation-methods into implement-powershell-discover
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
Implements an optimized approach to discovering PowerShell resources using .NET with parallel processing and direct result synchronization.
The previous approach using Get-ChildItem had unnecessary object overhead and required post-processing with
Where-Object. The same is implied when using a thread-safe collection (ConcurrentBag), which adds unnecessary complexity.PR Context
Fix #913
Note
While I recognize the need for caching in the issue, I left it out for now, assuming we can increment it over time.