Skip to content

Conversation

@rodriquelca
Copy link
Contributor

@rodriquelca rodriquelca commented Nov 10, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Expected behavior:
Task destination should be displayed according to each condition
Actual behavior:
All conditions are not displayed according to each matching only the Screen Interstitial is displayed

Solution

  • add displayNextAssignedTask validation

How to Test

please review the steps in the related ticket

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:modeler:feature/FOUR-26707
ci:screen-builder:feature/FOUR-26707
ci:processmaker:feature/FOUR-26707

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 10, 2025

screen-builder    Run #2071

Run Properties:  status check failed Failed #2071  •  git commit a4d1d7ed5e: FOUR-27077: Conditions are not working when `Display Next Assgined Task` option ...
Project screen-builder
Branch Review feature/FOUR-26707
Run status status check failed Failed #2071
Run duration 09m 45s
Commit git commit a4d1d7ed5e: FOUR-27077: Conditions are not working when `Display Next Assgined Task` option ...
Committer David Callizaya
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 1
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 7
Tests that passed  Passing 381
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Tests for review

Failed  tests/e2e/specs/ValidationRules.spec.js • 1 failed test • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test Artifacts
Validation Rules > Validations should be skipped for readonly fields Test Replay Screenshots

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

@caleeli caleeli merged commit 90e0b9d into feature/FOUR-26707 Nov 10, 2025
30 of 42 checks passed
@caleeli caleeli deleted the bugfix/FOUR-27077 branch November 10, 2025 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants