Support for synchronous kernel implementations. #220
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
@reconfig-bot try |
Contributor
reconfig-bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2018
…, r=<try> Support for synchronous kernel implementations. None
Contributor
|
💔 Test failed - status-jenkins |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Status At Wind-Down
This is a minor change which addresses the issue of combinatorial loops/lockups when an SDAccel kernel has a direct connection between the 'go' to the 'done' control links. This situation is only likely to occur for trivial cases such as examples/noop. Since it has no particular benefit to non-trivial examples there has not been a significant incentive to merge it.