- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 30
 
          Faster arraydist with LazyArrays.jl
          #231
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 15 commits
0aad616
              cd9c845
              3cfa86e
              896bce3
              fcf9bf4
              6d0855b
              74d4e38
              ae52b81
              fcdd588
              59423de
              bcfdecf
              90d3bbc
              9a1b201
              80b3d51
              a792e8b
              c9324a3
              b3b2786
              a43d6e5
              8604902
              File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
          
            
          
           | 
    @@ -48,3 +48,53 @@ parameterless_type(x) = parameterless_type(typeof(x)) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| parameterless_type(x::Type) = __parameterless_type(x) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @non_differentiable adapt_randn(::Any...) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| """ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closure{F,G} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A callable of the form `(x, args...) -> F(G(args...), x)`. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| # Examples | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is particularly useful when one wants to avoid broadcasting over constructors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| which can sometimes cause issues with type-inference, in particular when combined | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| with reverse-mode AD frameworks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ```juliarepl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> using DistributionsAD, Distributions, ReverseDiff, BenchmarkTools | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> const data = randn(1000); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> x = randn(length(data)); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> f(x) = sum(logpdf.(Normal.(x), data)) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| f (generic function with 2 methods) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> @btime ReverseDiff.gradient(\$f, \$x); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 848.759 μs (14605 allocations: 521.84 KiB) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> # Much faster with ReverseDiff.jl. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| g(x) = sum(DistributionsAD.Closure(logpd, Normal).(data, x)) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
                
      
                  torfjelde marked this conversation as resolved.
               
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
         | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| g (generic function with 1 method) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| julia> @btime ReverseDiff.gradient(\$g, \$x); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17.460 μs (17 allocations: 71.52 KiB) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ``` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| See https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/issues/1934 more further discussion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| """ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| struct Closure{F,G} end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closure(::F, ::G) where {F,G} = Closure{F,G}() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closure(::F, ::Type{G}) where {F,G} = Closure{F,G}() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closure(::Type{F}, ::G) where {F,G} = Closure{F,G}() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closure(::Type{F}, ::Type{G}) where {F,G} = Closure{F,G}() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
         
      Comment on lines
    
      +87
     to 
      +92
    
   
  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is not really what I had in mind. More something like  
        Suggested change
       
    
 Generally just storing the type of e.g.  However, with fields the struct the performance with ReverseDiff is bad since then we hit https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ReverseDiff.jl/blob/d522508aa6fea16e9716607cdd27d63453bb61e6/src/derivatives/broadcast.jl#L27. This can be fixed by defining ReverseDiff.mayhavetracked(c::Closure) = ReverseDiff.mayhavetracked(c.f) || ReverseDiff.mayhavetracked(c.g)I wonder if we can just improve the heuristics in ReverseDiff use a similar check for structs/types with multiple fields. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. So I originally had fields but yeah this resulted in bad computation paths. Might be something that should be changed in the AD instead, true. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Worth pointing out that 
  | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @generated function (closure::Closure{F,G})(x, args...) where {F,G} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| f = Base.issingletontype(F) ? F.instance : F | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| g = Base.issingletontype(G) ? G.instance : G | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
         
      Comment on lines
    
      +135
     to 
      +136
    
   
  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not a 100% certain on this. Need to think when I've had some sleep.  | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| return :($f($g(args...), x)) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
         
      Comment on lines
    
      +134
     to 
      +138
    
   
  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not a fan of  If we want to keep  julia> struct Closure{F,G} end
julia> Closure(::F, ::G) where {F,G} = Closure{F,G}()
julia> Closure(::F, ::Type{G}) where {F,G} = Closure{F,Type{G}}()
julia> Closure(::Type{F}, ::G) where {F,G} = Closure{Type{F},G}()
julia> Closure(::Type{F}, ::Type{G}) where {F,G} = Closure{Type{F},Type{G}}()
julia> (::Closure{F,G})(x, args...) where {F,G} = F.instance(G.instance(args...), x)
julia> (::Closure{F,Type{G}})(x, args...) where {F,G} = F.instance(G(args...), x)
julia> (::Closure{Type{F},G})(x, args...) where {F,G} = F(G.instance(args...), x)
julia> (::Closure{Type{F},Type{G}})(x, args...) where {F,G} = F(G(args...), x)But somehow this version and the one in the PR seem all a bit hacky... There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 
 As mentioned before, I 100% agree with you. But this performance issue is literally the cause of several Slack and Discourse threads of people going "why is Turing so slow for this simple model?", and so IMO we should just get this fixed despite its hackiness and then we make it less hacky as we go + maybe improve ReverseDiff and Zygote. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oh and regarding the   | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
     | 
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | 
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ | ||
| using .LazyArrays: BroadcastArray, BroadcastVector, LazyArray | ||
                
      
                  torfjelde marked this conversation as resolved.
               
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
         | 
||
| 
     | 
||
| const LazyVectorOfUnivariate{ | ||
| S<:ValueSupport, | ||
| T<:UnivariateDistribution{S}, | ||
| Tdists<:BroadcastVector{T}, | ||
| } = VectorOfUnivariate{S,T,Tdists} | ||
| 
     | 
||
| _inner_constructor(::Type{<:BroadcastVector{<:Any,Type{D}}}) where {D} = D | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function Distributions._logpdf( | ||
| dist::LazyVectorOfUnivariate, | ||
| x::AbstractVector{<:Real}, | ||
| ) | ||
| # TODO: Make use of `sum(Broadcast.instantiate(Broadcast.broadcasted(f, x, args...)))` once | ||
| # we've addressed performance issues in ReverseDiff.jl. | ||
| constructor = _inner_constructor(typeof(dist.v)) | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm sure this will be problematic in some cases and break. It's not guaranteed that  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. A simple example: julia> struct A{X,Y}
           x::X
           y::Y
           A(x::X, y::Y) where {X,Y} = new{X,Y}(x, y)
       end
julia> _constructor(::Type{D}) where {D} = D
_constructor (generic function with 1 method)
julia> x, y = 1, 2.0
(1, 2.0)
julia> a = A(x, y)
A{Int64, Float64}(1, 2.0)
julia> _constructor(typeof(a))(x, y)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching A{Int64, Float64}(::Int64, ::Float64)
Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope
   @ REPL[31]:1There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. So I was actually using ConstructionBase locally for this before:) But I removed it because I figured this will only be used for a very simple subset of constructors, so uncertain if it's worth it. But I'll add it back again:)  | 
||
| return sum(Closure(logpdf, constructor).(x, dist.v.args...)) | ||
| end | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function Distributions.logpdf( | ||
| dist::LazyVectorOfUnivariate, | ||
| x::AbstractMatrix{<:Real}, | ||
| ) | ||
| size(x, 1) == length(dist) || | ||
| throw(DimensionMismatch("Inconsistent array dimensions.")) | ||
| constructor = _inner_constructor(typeof(dist.v)) | ||
| return vec(sum(Closure(logpdf, constructor).(x, dist.v.args...), dims = 1)) | ||
| end | ||
| 
     | 
||
| const LazyMatrixOfUnivariate{ | ||
| S<:ValueSupport, | ||
| T<:UnivariateDistribution{S}, | ||
| Tdists<:BroadcastArray{T,2}, | ||
| } = MatrixOfUnivariate{S,T,Tdists} | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function Distributions._logpdf( | ||
| dist::LazyMatrixOfUnivariate, | ||
| x::AbstractMatrix{<:Real}, | ||
| ) | ||
| 
     | 
||
| constructor = _inner_constructor(typeof(dist.v)) | ||
| return sum(Closure(logpdf, constructor).(x, dist.v.args)) | ||
| end | ||
| 
     | 
||
| lazyarray(f, x...) = BroadcastArray(f, x...) | ||
| export lazyarray | ||
| 
         
      Comment on lines
    
      +45
     to 
      +47
    
   
  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's not clear to me why this is needed. It doesn't seem much shorter and it makes it less clear that everything is based on LazyArrays. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oh no this was already in DistributionsAD.jl 🤷 Not something I put in here. I was also unaware of this methods existence. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we deprecate it? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Happy to!  | 
||
| 
     | 
||
| # HACK: All of the below probably shouldn't be here. | ||
| function ChainRulesCore.rrule(::Type{BroadcastArray}, f, args...) | ||
| function BroadcastArray_pullback(Δ::ChainRulesCore.Tangent) | ||
| return (ChainRulesCore.NoTangent(), Δ.f, Δ.args...) | ||
| end | ||
| return BroadcastArray(f, args...), BroadcastArray_pullback | ||
| end | ||
| 
     | 
||
| ChainRulesCore.ProjectTo(ba::BroadcastArray) = ProjectTo{typeof(ba)}((f=ba.f,)) | ||
| function (p::ChainRulesCore.ProjectTo{BA})(args...) where {BA<:BroadcastArray} | ||
| return ChainRulesCore.Tangent{BA}(f=p.f, args=args) | ||
| end | ||
| 
         
      Comment on lines
    
      +50
     to 
      +60
    
   
  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm surprised this is needed. Feels like that's the default for  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, so we can alos just close over the function   | 
||
| 
     | 
||
| function ChainRulesCore.rrule( | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. BTW the annoying thing about these kinds of general rules is that it might break (and it happened to me multiple times) code that would have worked without rule and if one would just let the AD system perform its default differentiation. One can fix these issues though by using  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We could also just define this using  Unfortunately there's no way around this because we have to stop Zygote from trying to differentiate through the broadcasted constructor.  | 
||
| config::ChainRulesCore.RuleConfig{>:ChainRulesCore.HasReverseMode}, | ||
| ::typeof(Distributions.logpdf), | ||
                
      
                  torfjelde marked this conversation as resolved.
               
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
         | 
||
| dist::LazyVectorOfUnivariate, | ||
| x::AbstractVector{<:Real} | ||
| ) | ||
| cl = DistributionsAD.Closure(logpdf, DistributionsAD._inner_constructor(typeof(dist.v))) | ||
| y, dy = ChainRulesCore.rrule_via_ad(config, broadcast, cl, x, dist.v.args...) | ||
| z, dz = ChainRulesCore.rrule_via_ad(config, sum, y) | ||
| 
     | 
||
| project_broadcastarray = ChainRulesCore.ProjectTo(dist.v) | ||
| function logpdf_adjoint(Δ...) | ||
| # 1st argument is `sum` -> nothing. | ||
| (_, sum_Δ...) = dz(Δ...) | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Generally you might have to deal with  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But should the other pullbacks also deal with this? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Seems like we only need to deal with   | 
||
| # 1st argument is `broadcast` -> nothing. | ||
| # 2nd argument is `cl` -> `nothing`. | ||
| # 3rd argument is `x` -> something. | ||
| # Rest is `dist` arguments -> something | ||
| (_, _, x_Δ, args_Δ...) = dy(sum_Δ...) | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One thing I'm worried about: what if  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Okay, so that should be addressed with the  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The following example in ChainRules is related: https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl/blob/9adf759bc63432dc518ccf499d6938fc5a217113/src/rulesets/Base/mapreduce.jl#L76  | 
||
| # Construct the structural tangents. | ||
| ba_tangent = project_broadcastarray(args_Δ...) | ||
| dist_tangent = ChainRulesCore.Tangent{typeof(dist)}(v=ba_tangent) | ||
| 
     | 
||
| return (ChainRulesCore.NoTangent(), dist_tangent, x_Δ) | ||
| end | ||
| 
     | 
||
| return z, logpdf_adjoint | ||
| end | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This even has a bug in it:
distsisn't defined..