Skip to content

Conversation

@sredxny
Copy link
Collaborator

@sredxny sredxny commented Dec 4, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

  • I ensured that the documentation is up to date
  • I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
  • I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

@probelabs
Copy link

probelabs bot commented Dec 4, 2025

This PR introduces a single-line comment in certs/manager.go. Given the title, "test branch protection rulesets", this change appears to be for testing repository configuration and has no functional impact on the application.

Files Changed Analysis

  • certs/manager.go: A single comment // test was added. (+1 addition, 0 deletions).

Architecture & Impact Assessment

  • Accomplishment: The PR's purpose is to test the branch protection rules configured for this repository.
  • Key Technical Changes: A non-functional code comment was added.
  • Affected System Components: The change is isolated to the certs/manager.go file and has no effect on the system's architecture or runtime behavior.

Scope Discovery & Context Expansion

  • The scope of this change is limited to a single comment in one file. The context is related to repository management and CI/CD pipeline validation rather than application functionality. No further code analysis is required.
Metadata
  • Review Effort: 1 / 5
  • Primary Label: chore

Powered by Visor from Probelabs

Last updated: 2025-12-04T15:06:14.812Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 642cd9e

💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using /visor ask <your question>

@probelabs
Copy link

probelabs bot commented Dec 4, 2025

✅ Security Check Passed

No security issues found – changes LGTM.

Architecture Issues (1)

Severity Location Issue
🟡 Warning certs/manager.go:32
A temporary comment `// test` was added. This comment does not provide any clarification or documentation for the code and appears to be for testing purposes. It should be removed before merging to maintain code clarity.
💡 SuggestionRemove the temporary test comment.

✅ Performance Check Passed

No performance issues found – changes LGTM.

Quality Issues (1)

Severity Location Issue
🟡 Warning certs/manager.go:32
The added comment `// test` is non-descriptive and provides no context. While this PR appears to be for testing branch protection rules, such comments should not be merged into the main codebase as they add clutter without providing value.
💡 SuggestionRemove the comment before merging. If this change is purely for testing and not intended for merge, please close the pull request.

Powered by Visor from Probelabs

Last updated: 2025-12-04T15:06:20.378Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 642cd9e

💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using /visor ask <your question>

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🚨 Jira Linter Failed

Commit: 642cd9e
Failed at: 2025-12-04 15:06:03 UTC

The Jira linter failed to validate your PR. Please check the error details below:

🔍 Click to view error details
failed to validate branch and PR title rules: branch name 'test-new-branch-protection-rulesets' must contain a valid Jira ticket ID (e.g., ABC-123)

Next Steps

  • Ensure your branch name contains a valid Jira ticket ID (e.g., ABC-123)
  • Verify your PR title matches the branch's Jira ticket ID
  • Check that the Jira ticket exists and is accessible

This comment will be automatically deleted once the linter passes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

API Changes

--- prev.txt	2025-12-04 15:06:49.534912774 +0000
+++ current.txt	2025-12-04 15:06:40.143704410 +0000
@@ -5516,6 +5516,8 @@
 var (
 	CertManagerLogPrefix = "cert_storage"
 )
+    test
+
 
 FUNCTIONS
 

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants