Skip to content

Conversation

Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor

@Ref34t Ref34t commented Aug 5, 2025

Implement AiProviderRegistry with full Provider interface integration

This PR adds the core Provider Registry functionality that enables provider discovery and model selection based on requirements. This is a critical MVP component that unlocks the main AiClient functionality.

Key Features

  • Provider registration and validation - Complete interface validation
  • Provider discovery by ID or class name - Flexible provider lookup
  • Model metadata discovery with requirements matching - Intelligent model selection
  • Provider availability checking - Real-time configuration validation
  • Model instantiation functionality - Direct model instance creation
  • Comprehensive error handling and validation - Production-ready robustness

Implementation Status

✅ FULLY INTEGRATED with Provider interfaces from PR #35:

  • Real interface validation using ProviderInterface::class
  • Actual static method calls: metadata(), availability(), modelMetadataDirectory(), model()
  • Enhanced ModelMetadata with meetsRequirements() method for intelligent selection
  • Complete mock provider ecosystem implementing all interfaces

Technical Details

  • Architecture: Full API as specified in architecture documentation
  • Code Quality: WordPress coding standards and PHPCS/PHPStan compliant
  • Integration: Uses Provider interfaces and existing DTOs (ProviderMetadata, ModelRequirements, etc.)
  • Testing: Comprehensive test suite (13 tests, 548 total tests passing)
  • Performance: O(1) capability lookups with optimized maps

Files Added/Modified

Core Implementation

  • src/Providers/AiProviderRegistry.php - Main registry with interface integration
  • src/Providers/Models/DTO/ModelMetadata.php - Enhanced with meetsRequirements()

Provider Interfaces (from PR #35)

  • src/Providers/Contracts/ProviderInterface.php
  • src/Providers/Contracts/ModelMetadataDirectoryInterface.php
  • src/Providers/Contracts/ProviderAvailabilityInterface.php
  • src/Providers/Models/Contracts/ModelInterface.php

Testing Infrastructure

  • tests/unit/Providers/AiProviderRegistryTest.php - Comprehensive test suite
  • tests/unit/Providers/MockProvider.php - Full interface implementation
  • tests/unit/Providers/MockModel.php - Model interface implementation
  • tests/unit/Providers/MockModelMetadataDirectory.php - Directory interface
  • tests/unit/Providers/MockProviderAvailability.php - Availability interface

MVP Impact

This Registry implementation:

  • Enables the main AiClient class - Core infrastructure for provider-agnostic AI access
  • Unlocks intelligent model selection - Automatic discovery based on requirements
  • Provides production-ready foundation - Ready for immediate use when PR Adds Provider interfaces #35 merges
  • Positions for next MVP phase - All registry-dependent components can now be built

Next Steps

Ready for merge when PR #35 (Provider interfaces) lands. This Registry will work immediately with no additional changes needed.

@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 6, 2025

@felixarntz, kindly review my PR when you have an opportunity

@Ref34t Ref34t force-pushed the feature/provider-registry branch from 8dd978c to c44fe96 Compare August 7, 2025 08:58
Mohamed Khaled added 9 commits August 8, 2025 11:04
Add core Provider Registry functionality that enables provider discovery
and model selection based on requirements. This is a critical MVP component
that unlocks the main AiClient functionality.

**Key Features:**
- Provider registration and validation
- Provider discovery by ID or class name
- Model metadata discovery with requirements matching
- Provider instance caching for performance
- Comprehensive error handling and validation

**Implementation Details:**
- Full API as specified in architecture documentation
- Follows WordPress coding standards and documentation practices
- Uses existing Provider DTOs (ProviderMetadata, ModelRequirements, etc.)
- Includes method existence validation for duck typing
- Comprehensive test coverage (13 tests, 28 assertions)

**Files Added:**
- src/Providers/AiProviderRegistry.php - Main registry implementation
- tests/unit/Providers/AiProviderRegistryTest.php - Full test suite
- tests/unit/Providers/MockProvider.php - Test provider implementation

**TODOs for Future Enhancement:**
- Integration with ProviderInterface when PR WordPress#35 merges
- Model metadata directory implementation
- Provider availability checking
- Model instantiation functionality

This implementation provides the foundation for provider-agnostic AI access
and enables the next phase of MVP development.
Address all static analysis issues:
- Fix null comparison in isProviderConfigured method
- Add proper type validation for provider metadata calls
- Simplify ModelConfig parameter type to avoid array confusion
- Update test to match new method signature

All tests still pass (13 tests, 27 assertions)
PHPStan now reports no errors
…ss#35

This commit transforms the Registry from placeholder implementation to fully
functional provider orchestration system:

• Add all Provider interface contracts from PR WordPress#35
• Update Registry to use real interface methods instead of TODOs
• Enhance ModelMetadata with meetsRequirements() method for intelligent selection
• Create complete mock provider ecosystem for comprehensive testing
• Fix all PHPStan type safety and PHPCS style compliance issues
• Achieve 100% test coverage with 548 passing tests

Registry is now production-ready and will work immediately when PR WordPress#35 merges.
This positions the project for MVP phase development with core infrastructure complete.
Fix code style issues in Registry integration:
• Fix multi-line function declaration formatting
• Fix MockModel file header issues
• Fix newline endings for all interface files
• Remove trailing whitespace from all files

All PHPCS errors resolved, warnings remain for other test files.
Remove all tokenCount constructor parameters and getTokenCount() method calls
from test files to match upstream Candidate DTO changes. Resolves all test
failures related to the tokenCount removal in commit 24a6612.
Break up long lines in test assertions to comply with 120 character limit:
- FunctionResponseTest.php: Fix assertEquals with long array parameters
- FunctionDeclarationTest.php: Fix assertArrayHasKeys with long parameter list
- ModelConfigTest.php: Break up long expectedProperties array definition
- FileTest.php: Fix expectExceptionMessage and assertEquals with long parameters

All PHPCS warnings now resolved, CI checks will pass.
Remove duplicate method declaration that was causing fatal error.
The upstream version in ModelMetadata is retained with proper
implementation using capability and option maps for O(1) lookup.
@Ref34t Ref34t force-pushed the feature/provider-registry branch from 3daf4cb to b1e63d5 Compare August 8, 2025 08:09
Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ref34t Thank you for the PR, and apologies for the delay!

Since the foundation for the provider and model classes was still being implemented in #35, I was thinking it would make more sense to review this PR afterwards.

Overall the AiProviderRegistry implementation looks great!

There are however several other changes in this PR that seem unnecessary or unrelated, possibly due to merge conflicts.

Can you please refresh this against latest trunk and revert the changes in:

  • ModelInterface
  • ModelMetadata
  • FileTest
  • ModelConfigTest
  • GenerativeAiResultTest.php
  • GenerativeAiResultTest.php.bak

Afterwards, I can properly review the changes related to the AiProviderRegistry and the new mock classes for testing.

@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 13, 2025

@felixarntz thank you 🙏 I really appreciate your detailed feedback. I will tackle your requests and will update the PR

@felixarntz felixarntz added this to the Complete Extender API milestone Aug 13, 2025
- Revert ModelInterface to trunk version (method signatures)
- Revert ModelMetadata to trunk version
- Revert FileTest, ModelConfigTest, GenerativeAiResultTest to trunk
- Remove GenerativeAiResultTest.php.bak backup file
- Update MockModel to use trunk method signatures
- All tests passing (543/543)
- PHPCS compliant
@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 14, 2025

@felixarntz Thank you for the detailed feedback! I have addressed all your requests:

Cleaned up unrelated changes:

  • Reverted ModelInterface to trunk version (method signatures)
  • Reverted ModelMetadata to trunk version
  • Reverted FileTest, ModelConfigTest, GenerativeAiResultTest to trunk versions
  • Removed GenerativeAiResultTest.php.bak backup file
  • Updated MockModel to match trunk method signatures

All tests passing: 543/543 tests pass
Code quality: PHPCS compliant with zero errors

The PR now contains only the AiProviderRegistry implementation and related testing infrastructure. Ready for review when convenient.

Thank you again for taking the time to review! 🙏

@Ref34t Ref34t requested a review from felixarntz August 14, 2025 07:48
@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 14, 2025

Question for next contribution:

@felixarntz I've reviewed the current MVP progress in Issue #20 and noticed that you're actively working on the provider infrastructure (PR #39) and @JasonTheAdams is handling the HTTP infrastructure (PR #47).

For my next contribution, I'd like to focus on the remaining client-facing API components that aren't currently being worked on:

  • AiClient class - Main public API entry point
  • PromptBuilder - Fluent prompt building interface
  • MessageBuilder - Message construction API
  • Utility classes - RequirementsUtil and supporting logic

Which of these would be most valuable to tackle first? I'm particularly interested in the AiClient class since it would integrate directly with the Registry we just implemented and provide the main developer interface.

Any guidance on priority or architectural preferences would be greatly appreciated! 🙏

@JasonTheAdams
Copy link
Member

JasonTheAdams commented Aug 14, 2025

@Ref34t I'll be working on the PromptBuilder and MesesageBuilder today/tomorrow if you want to tackle the AiClient and utilities classes!

Thanks for jumping in with us! 🎉

@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams self-requested a review August 14, 2025 17:37
Copy link
Member

@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this great work, @Ref34t! I left some suggestions, mostly around types.

Also, can you please move the test mocks you made to the tests/mocks directory? All classes inside tests/unit should correspond directly with src/.

Mohamed Khaled added 11 commits August 15, 2025 11:08
- Move mock classes from tests/unit/Providers/ to tests/mocks/ directory
- Rename AiProviderRegistryTest to ProviderRegistryTest to match renamed class
- Update mock class namespaces to WordPress\AiClient\Tests\mocks
- Ensure tests/unit structure mirrors src/ structure properly
- Remove unnecessary @var annotation since resolveProviderClassName() already validates and returns class-string<ProviderInterface>
- Type safety is now handled centrally in resolveProviderClassName method
@Ref34t Ref34t requested a review from JasonTheAdams August 15, 2025 08:55
@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 15, 2025

@JasonTheAdams, all your comments are now resolved

  • All types and docblocks are fixed
  • Moved the mock tests to the right directory
  • Changed the AiProviderRegistryTest to ProviderRegistryTest

You can have a look now. Thanks Alot 💯

Mohamed Khaled and others added 5 commits August 15, 2025 08:30
Fix code style issues in Registry integration:
• Fix multi-line function declaration formatting
• Fix MockModel file header issues
• Fix newline endings for all interface files
• Remove trailing whitespace from all files

All PHPCS errors resolved, warnings remain for other test files.
Break up long lines in test assertions to comply with 120 character limit:
- FunctionResponseTest.php: Fix assertEquals with long array parameters
- FunctionDeclarationTest.php: Fix assertArrayHasKeys with long parameter list
- ModelConfigTest.php: Break up long expectedProperties array definition
- FileTest.php: Fix expectExceptionMessage and assertEquals with long parameters

All PHPCS warnings now resolved, CI checks will pass.
Copy link
Member

@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Thanks, @Ref34t!

Sorry about the weird commits at the end. I rebased from trunk to check some new code standard stuff, and something went strangely. But I fixed it up.

@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams changed the title Implement AiProviderRegistry with comprehensive test suite Implement ProviderRegistry with comprehensive test suite Aug 15, 2025
@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2025
11 tasks
Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ref34t Almost good to go, this looks great! A few last points of feedback.

public function hasProvider(string $idOrClassName): bool
{
return isset($this->providerClassNames[$idOrClassName]) ||
in_array($idOrClassName, $this->providerClassNames, true);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in_array is not as efficient as using isset. Since this method may be commonly called, I think it would be best to add another class property keyed by the provider class names. This way you can use isset for the second check here too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resolved here 6e25240

Comment on lines 222 to 227
// Validate that class implements ProviderInterface (for PHPStan type safety)
if (!is_subclass_of($className, ProviderInterface::class)) {
throw new InvalidArgumentException(
sprintf('Provider class must implement %s: %s', ProviderInterface::class, $className)
);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is unnecessary. It's impossible for $className to not implement ProviderInterface, since it's already enforced at the registration level, which is the only way to modify this property.

If PHPStan complains about this, we should rather ignore that because it's an invalid complaint I think.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@felixarntz resolved here f868e7b

@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 15, 2025

@felixarntz thanks for those remarkable suggestions I appreciate it. I'll update them today

@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 15, 2025

@felixarntz Both suggestions implemented as shown above. in your hands now 👍

@JasonTheAdams JasonTheAdams merged commit ef7d83a into WordPress:trunk Aug 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@JasonTheAdams
Copy link
Member

Merged! Thanks again, @Ref34t! 🎉

@Ref34t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref34t commented Aug 15, 2025

@JasonTheAdams awesome 😎 into the next one

@Ref34t Ref34t deleted the feature/provider-registry branch August 29, 2025 19:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants