Skip to content

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link

@G-Rath G-Rath commented May 9, 2025

I have started using this library in a project (it's working great!) and noticed the types were lacking so I've done my best to fill them out as I've used them + based on the documentation.

I know they're not complete, but it should be easy to expand them further as people use the types

@G-Rath G-Rath marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 01:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant